SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Guide to This Supplement
14 references·0 citing·41 second hop
A Guide to This Supplement (2005)A Guide to This SupplementMethods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2015)Methods of Meta-Analysis: Cor…Challenges in Using Nonrandomized Studies in Systematic Reviews of Treatment Interventions (2005)Challenges in Using Nonrandom…Challenges in Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Topics Related to the Delivery, Organization, and Financing of Health Care (2005)Challenges in Systematic Revi…Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Evaluate Drug Efficacy or Effectiveness (2005)Challenges in Systematic Revi…Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harms (2005)Challenges in Systematic Revi…Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Therapeutic Devices and Procedures (2005)Challenges in Systematic Revi…Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Educational Intervention Studies (2005)Challenges in Systematic Revi…Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Economic Analyses (2005)Challenges in Systematic Revi…Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Technologies (2005)Challenges in Systematic Revi…Better Information for Better Health Care: The Evidence-based Practice Center Program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2005)Better Information for Better…Systematic reviews in health care a practical guide (2001)Systematic reviews in health …Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health …Systematic reviews : synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions (1998)Systematic reviews : synthesi…Meta-analysis by the confidence profile method (1992)Meta-analysis by the confiden…The effectiveness of continuing medical education (1981)Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews (1997)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Cultural Competence (2005)The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: a systematic review (2007)Tools for Direct Observation and Assessment of Clinical Skills of Medical Trainees (2009)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Development of the RTI item bank on risk of bias and precision of observational studies (2011)Dance for People With Parkinson Disease: What Is the Evidence Telling Us? (2014)A principal component analysis is conducted for a case series quality appraisal checklist (2015)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Diagnostic accuracy of the mood module of the Patient Health Questionnaire: a systematic review (2007)Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society (1997)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS (1991)Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Mental Health of Elite Athletes: A Narrative Systematic Review (2016)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings5,561 cited
  • 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,312 cited
  • 2001Systematic reviews in health care a practical guide230 cited
  • 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Technologies176 cited
  • 1998Systematic reviews : synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions173 cited
  • 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Educational Intervention Studies169 cited
  • 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harms147 cited
  • 1992Meta-analysis by the confidence profile method144 cited
  • 2005Better Information for Better Health Care: The Evidence-based Practice Center Program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality133 cited
  • 2005Challenges in Using Nonrandomized Studies in Systematic Reviews of Treatment Interventions103 cited
  • 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Economic Analyses94 cited
  • 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Therapeutic Devices and Procedures70 cited
  • 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Topics Related to the Delivery, Organization, and Financing of Health Care59 cited
  • 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Evaluate Drug Efficacy or Effectiveness36 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.