SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Síntesis de la evidencia clínica y metaanálisis en red con comparaciones indirectas
16 references·2 citing·43 second hop
Síntesis de la evidencia clínica y metaanálisis en red con comparaciones indirectas (2012)Síntesis de la evidencia clínica y metaan…A practical introduction to multivariate meta-analysis (2012)A practical introduction to m…Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Scientific Rationale and Interpretation (2011)Systematic Reviews and Meta-A…Revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: bases conceptuales e interpretación (2011)Revisiones sistemáticas y met…Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed (2011)Network meta-analysis-highly …Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality (2010)Indirect Comparisons: A Revie…Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis (2010)Declaración PRISMA: una propu…Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Checking consistency in mixed…Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews (2009)Methodological problems in th…Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses (2009)Integration of evidence from …A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered (2009)A case study of multiple-trea…Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Evaluation of networks of ran…Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons (2006)Assessing Evidence Inconsiste…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)How should meta‐regression an…The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)The results of direct and ind…Bayesian approaches to random‐effects meta‐analysis: A comparative study (1995)Bayesian approaches to random…Conceptos básicos del metaanálisis en red (2014)Conceptos básicos del metaaná…A checklist for critical appraisal of indirect comparisons (2014)A checklist for critical appr…Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (2002)Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4 (2013)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA (2016)Women Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review to Outline the Boundaries of Scientific Literature (2020)Between Level Up and Game Over: A Systematic Literature Review of Gamification in Education (2021)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)A general parametric approach to the meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials (1991)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)NICE DSU Technical Support Document 2: A Generalised Linear Modelling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials (2011)Comparative Efficacy of Seven Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Patients with Depression: A Network Meta-Analysis (2013)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index? (2006)Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1 (2011)Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis (2013)Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians (2016)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis (2013)Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata (2017)Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews (2018)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies (2012)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2016)BUGSnet: an R package to facilitate the conduct and reporting of Bayesian network Meta-analyses (2019)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis (2010)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?3,021 cited
  • 2010Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis2,517 cited
  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited
  • 2010Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis1,370 cited
  • 2007Evaluation of networks of randomized trials1,077 cited
  • 2006Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons755 cited
  • 2009Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses713 cited
  • 1995Bayesian approaches to random‐effects meta‐analysis: A comparative study568 cited
  • 2009Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews395 cited
  • 2011Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed361 cited
  • 2009A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered302 cited
  • 2012A practical introduction to multivariate meta-analysis255 cited
  • 2011

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: bases conceptuales e interpretación
179 cited
  • 2010Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality145 cited
  • 2011Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Scientific Rationale and Interpretation71 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2014Conceptos básicos del metaanálisis en red21 cited
    • 2014A checklist for critical appraisal of indirect comparisons20 cited