SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance
2 references·16 citing·50 second hop
Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance (2001)Language biases in the coverage of the Sc…The Scientific Wealth of Nations (1997)The Scientific Wealth of Nati…New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995)New bibliometric tools for th…Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage (2024)Regional disparities in Web o…Interpreting Bibliometric Data (2021)Interpreting Bibliometric DataWeb of Science and Scopus language coverage (2019)Web of Science and Scopus lan…Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison (2018)Coverage of highly-cited docu…The changing role of non-English papers in scholarly communication: Evidence from Web of Science's three journal citation indexes (2016)The changing role of non-Engl…Analysis and Visualization of Citation Networks (2015)Analysis and Visualization of…R esearch G ate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship? (2014)R esearch G ate: Disseminatin…The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation (2012)The Leiden ranking 2011/2012:…Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies (2010)Nanoscience and technology pu…Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? (2009)Should you believe in the Sha…Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities (2009)Highly cited leaders and the …The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible (2006)The application of bibliometr…For Your Citations Only? Hot Topics in Bibliometric Analysis (2005)For Your Citations Only? Hot …What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? (2004)What determines the citation …Measuring Science (2004)Measuring ScienceAdvantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance (2002)Advantages and limitations in…The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Altmetrics: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media (2016)Big Scholarly Data: A Survey (2017)Social Media and Health Care, Part I: Literature Review of Social Media Use by Health Care Providers (2021)Impact factors: use and abuse. (2003)Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis (2004)The "impact factor" revisited (2005)Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data (2005)Assessing basic research (1983)New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation (2009)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences (1999)The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences (1999)The Four Literatures of Social Science (2006)Climate change and tourism: a scientometric analysis using CiteSpace (2017)A bibliometric analysis of born global firms (2018)Thirty years of research in family business journals: Status quo and future directions (2021)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques (2017)Bibliometrics of social media research: A co-citation and co-word analysis (2017)Past, present, and future of customer engagement (2021)Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)The Academic Ranking of World Universities (2005)Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations (2010)How do you define and measure research productivity? (2014)Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method (2015)Emerging trends and new developments in information science: a document co-citation analysis (2009–2016) (2018)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)The scientific impact of nations (2004)Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results (2007)Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties (2013)Exploratory Research (2020)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases (2022)Google Earth Engine: A Global Analysis and Future Trends (2023)The frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations (2000)Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis (2011)Past, Present, and Future of Electronic Word of Mouth (EWOM) (2020)Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science (2010)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)WEIRD languages have misled us, too [Comment on Henrich et al.] (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997The Scientific Wealth of Nations596 cited
  • 1995New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications499 cited

Cited by

  • 2012The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation444 cited
  • 2019Web of Science and Scopus language coverage388 cited
  • 2004What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?367 cited
  • 2002Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance302 cited
  • 2005For Your Citations Only? Hot Topics in Bibliometric Analysis281 cited
  • 2004Measuring Science279 cited
  • 2006The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible262 cited
  • 2014R esearch G ate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship?256 cited
  • 2009Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking?217 cited
  • 2015Analysis and Visualization of Citation Networks208 cited
  • 2009Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities207 cited
  • 2018Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison199 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2024Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage190 cited
  • 2021Interpreting Bibliometric Data174 cited
  • 2010Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies169 cited
  • 2016The changing role of non-English papers in scholarly communication: Evidence from Web of Science's three journal citation indexes166 cited