Article2005

Phase-Oriented Treatment of Structural Dissociation in Complex Traumatization: Overcoming Trauma-Related Phobias

Kathy Steele · Onno van der Hart · Ellert R. S. Nijenhuis

169 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Trauma & Dissociation

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments Personality Disorders and Psychopathology

Abstract

The theory of structural dissociation of the personality proposes that patients with complex trauma-related disorders are characterized by a division of their personality into different prototypical parts, each with its own psychobiological underpinnings. As one or more apparently normal parts (ANPs), patients have a propensity toward engaging in evolutionary prepared action systems for adaptation to daily living to guide their actions. Two or more emotional parts (EPs) are fixated in traumatic experience. As EPs, patients predominantly engage action systems related to physical defense and attachment cry. ANP and EP are insufficiently integrated, but interact and share a number of dispositions of the personality (e.g., speaking). All parts are stuck in maladaptive action tendencies that maintain dissociation, including a range of phobias, which is a major focus of this article. Phase-oriented treatment helps patients gradually develop adaptive mental and behavioral actions, thus overcoming their phobias and structural dissociation. Phase 1, symptom reduction and stabilization, is geared toward overcoming phobias of mental contents, dissociative parts, and attachment and attachment loss with the therapist. Phase 2, treatment of traumatic memories, is directed toward overcoming the phobia of traumatic memories, and phobias related to insecure attachment to the perpetrator(s), particularly in EPs. In Phase 3, integration and rehabilitation, treatment is focused on overcoming phobias of normal life, healthy risk-taking and change, and intimacy. To the degree that the theory of structural dissociation serves as an integrative heuristic for treatment, it should be compatible with other theories that guide effective treatment of patients with complex dissociative disorders.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 169 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 1993Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder 1999Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications 2000Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults.1992Trauma and Recovery 1992The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture 2018Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of the Self 2003Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis.

Cited by

2012Complex trauma and intimate relationships: The impact of shame, guilt and dissociation 2019The Role of Attachment Trauma and Disintegrative Pathogenic Processes in the Traumatic-Dissociative Dimension 2009EMDR and the Treatment of Complex PTSD: A Review 2013The integrative power of dance/movement therapy: Implications for the treatment of dissociation and developmental trauma 2014Unravelling the spirits’ message: a study of help-seeking steps and explanatory models among patients suffering from spirit possession in Uganda

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.