SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Characteristics of eyewitness identification that predict the outcome of real lineups
2 references·9 citing·32 second hop
Characteristics of eyewitness identification that predict the outcome of real lineups (2003)Characteristics of eyewitness identificat…Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. (1998)Eyewitness identification pro…Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender. (1981)Eyewitness identification: Li…Overview (2019)OverviewDouble-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: An experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure. (2014)Double-blind photo lineups us…An evaluation of lineup presentation, weapon presence, and a distinctive feature using ROC analysis. (2014)An evaluation of lineup prese…Predictors of eyewitness identification decisions from video lineups in England: A field study. (2011)Predictors of eyewitness iden…A field evaluation of the VIPER system: a new technique for eliciting eyewitness identification evidence (2011)A field evaluation of the VIP…Eyewitness Identification and the English Courts: A Century of Trial and Error* (2008)Eyewitness Identification and…Eyewitness lineups: Is the appearance-change instruction a good idea? (2006)Eyewitness lineups: Is the ap…Do strict rules and moving images increase the reliability of sequential identification procedures? (2006)Do strict rules and moving im…A policy evaluation of simultaneous and sequential lineups. (2006)A policy evaluation of simult…General Health Questionnaire (1978)Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. (1985)Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. (2001)Designing police lineups to maximize memory performance. (2019)Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. (1979)Mathematical Psychology (1991)The selection of distractors for eyewitness lineups. (1993)Social influence in eyewitness recall: A meta-analytic review of lineup instruction effects. (1997)Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: An archival analysis. (2001)The Redux of Cognitive Consistency Theories: Evidence Judgments by Constraint Satisfaction. (2004)Why Experts Make Errors (2006)Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance. (2012)Convicting the innocent: where criminal prosecutions go wrong (2011)Theoretical vs. empirical discriminability: the application of ROC methods to eyewitness identification (2018)Comparing system and estimator variables using data from real line-ups (1996)Surveillance and Society (2005)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The simulation heuristic (1982)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness nonidentifications. (1980)Eyewitness identification: Bayesian information gain, base-rate effect equivalency curves, and reasonable suspicion. (2015)ROC analysis of lineups does not measure underlying discriminability and has limited value. (2015)Understanding and Mitigating Bias in Forensic Evaluation: Lessons from Forensic Science (2017)Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research (1988)Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research (1968)Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis (1984)Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. (1987)Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility (2000)Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. (2009)The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1998Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads.819 cited
  • 1981Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender.364 cited

Cited by

  • 2014Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: An experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.101 cited
  • 2014An evaluation of lineup presentation, weapon presence, and a distinctive feature using ROC analysis.80 cited
  • 2011Predictors of eyewitness identification decisions from video lineups in England: A field study.69 cited
  • 2011A field evaluation of the VIPER system: a new technique for eliciting eyewitness identification evidence64 cited
  • 2006A policy evaluation of simultaneous and sequential lineups.55 cited
  • 2006Do strict rules and moving images increase the reliability of sequential identification procedures?54 cited
  • 2006Eyewitness lineups: Is the appearance-change instruction a good idea?50 cited
  • 2008Eyewitness Identification and the English Courts: A Century of Trial and Error*22 cited
  • 2019Overview0 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work