Toward a resolution of the Rorschach controversy.

Howard N. Garb · James M. Wood · M. Teresa Nezworski · William M. Grove · William J. Stejskal

61 citations0/0 files storedPsychological Assessment

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Deception detection and forensic psychology

Abstract

Comments are made about the articles comprising the first round of the Special Series on the Rorschach. G. Stricker and J. R. Gold (1999) and D. J. Viglione (1999) praised the Rorschach, but they consistently failed to cite negative findings. R. M. Dawes (1999) obtained results that provide modest support for the Rorschach, but one of his data sets is flawed. J. B. Hiller, R. Rosenthal, R. F. Bornstein, D. T. R. Berry, and S. Brunell-Neuleib (1999) reported the results of a meta-analysis, but, among other problems, their coders were not blind to the results of all the studies. J. Hunsley and J. M. Bailey (1999) made a strong case for concluding that there is no scientific basis for using the Rorschach. Recommendations are made for resolving the Rorschach controversy.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 61 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 1996A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey 1988Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis 1981Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed 2015Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings 1995The Handbook of Research Synthesis.1973The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability 2019Handbook of Psychological Assessment

Cited by

2015A Systematic Review of the Peer-Reviewed Literature on Self-Blame, Guilt, and Shame 2004Roots of the Rorschach controversy 2002Empirical support for interrater reliability of Rorschach Comprehensive System coding 2015Standards, accuracy, and questions of bias in Rorschach meta-analyses: Reply to Wood, Garb, Nezworski, Lilienfeld, and Duke (2015).2002Exploring Possible Ethnic Differences and Bias in the Rorschach Comprehensive System 2001

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.