Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California

Abstract

Educational reformers increasingly seek to manipulate policies regarding assessment, curriculum, and professional development in order to improve instruction. They assume that manipulating these elements of instructional policy will change teachers’ practice, which will then improve student performance. We formalize these ideas into a rudimentary model of the relations among instructional policy, teaching, and learning. We propose that successful instructional policies are themselves instructional in nature: because teachers figure as a key connection between policy and practice, their opportunities to learn about and from policy are a crucial influence both on their practice and, at least indirectly, on student achievement. Using data from a 1994 survey of California elementary school teachers and 1994 student California Learning Assessment System (CLAS) scores, we examine the influence of assessment, curriculum, and professional development on teacher practice and student achievement. Our results bear out the usefulness of the model: under circumstances that we identify, policy can affect practice, and both can affect student performance.

Cite this

David K. Cohen, Heather C. Hill (2000). Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00057

@article{k2000instructional,
  title  = {Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California},
  author = {Cohen, David K. and Hill, Heather C.},
  year   = {2000},
  journal = {Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education},
  doi    = {10.1111/0161-4681.00057}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 759 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by