Are they half as strong as they used to be? An experiment testing whether age-related social comparisons impair older people's hand grip strength and persistence

Hannah J. Swift · Ruth A. Lamont · Dominic Abrams

59 citations0/0 files storedBMJ Open

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Aging and Gerontology Research Nutrition and Health in Aging Frailty in Older Adults

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess how age-related social comparisons, which are likely to arise inadvertently or deliberately during assessments, may affect older people's performance on tests that are used to assess their needs and capability. DESIGN: The study randomly assigned participants to a comparison with younger people or a no comparison condition and assessed hand grip strength and persistence. Gender, education, type of residence, arthritis and age were also recorded. SETTING: Age UK centres and senior's lunches in the South of England. PARTICIPANTS: An opportunity sample of 56 adults, with a mean age of 82.25 years. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Hand grip strength measured using a manual hand dynamometer and persistence of grip measured using a stopwatch. RESULTS: Comparison caused significantly worse performance measured by both strength (comparison =6.85 kg, 95% CI 4.19 kg to 9.5 kg, control group =11.07 kg, 95% CI 8.47 kg to 13.68 kg, OR =0.51, p=0.027) and persistence (comparison =8.36 s, 95% CI 5.44 s to 11.29 s; control group =12.57 s, 95% CI 9.7 s to 15.45 s, OR =0.49, p=0.045). These effects remained significant after accounting for differences in arthritis, gender, education and adjusting for population age norms. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the potential for age comparisons and negative stereotype activation during assessment of older people, such assessments may underestimate physical capability by up to 50%. Because age comparisons are endemic, this means that assessment tests may sometimes seriously underestimate older people's capacity and prognosis, which has implications for the way healthcare professionals treat them in terms of autonomy and dependency.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 59 citations exist upstream.

References

1996The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.1999Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance 2005This Old Stereotype: The Pervasiveness and Persistence of the Elderly Stereotype 1996Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping.2003Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice against Older Persons 2003The Impact of Stereotype Threat on Age Differences in Memory Performance 2000Reducing Cardiovascular Stress With Positive Self-Stereotypes of Aging 1990Multiple stereotypes of elderly and young adults: A comparison of structure and evaluations.

Cited by

2024Breaking the links between ageism and health: An integrated perspective 2020The applied implications of age-based stereotype threat for older adults.2014Will to live in older people's medical decisions: immediate and delayed effects of aging stereotypes 2018Age stereotypes’ effects on motor learning in older adults: The impact may not be immediate, but instead delayed 2021Cognitive and metacognitive, motivational, and resource considerations for learning new skills across the lifespan

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.