Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Value-Induced Bias in Medical Decision Making

15 references·8 citing·33 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1957A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance24,224 cited
2017A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance18,122 cited
1980Unrealistic optimism about future life events.4,996 cited
1962Applied Statistical Decision Theory2,172 cited
1962Applied Statistical Decision Theory.1,443 cited
2006Thinking and Deciding1,422 cited
1959The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group.1,296 cited
1956Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives.1,089 cited
2000Psychological Experiments on the Internet463 cited
1999Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction.407 cited
1953Stated Expectations as Functions of Probability and Desirability of Outcomes281 cited
2001The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making.198 cited
1999Testing Critical Properties of Decision Making on the Internet132 cited
1995The elusive wishful thinking effect113 cited
1961Preparatory action and belief in the probable occurrence of future events.41 cited

Cited by

2016Cheating to get ahead or to avoid falling behind? The effect of potential negative versus positive status change on unethical behavior

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

72 cited

2016Making “sense” of ethical decision making42 cited

2010Leader‐driven distortion of probability and payoff information affects choices between risky prospects23 cited

2006Distorting the probability of treatment success to justify treatment decisions19 cited

2015A Comparison of the Effects of Ethics Training on International and US Students19 cited

2014Biases in Ethical Decision Making among University Faculty17 cited

2016Choice under incomplete information on incumbents: Why consumers with stronger preferences are more likely to abandon their prior choices6 cited

2009Investigating the influence of outcome utility on estimates of probability2 cited