SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessing the scientific research productivity of a leading toxicology journal: A case study of Human & Experimental Toxicology from 2003 to 2012
16 references·2 citing·44 second hop
Assessing the scientific research productivity of a leading toxicology journal: A case study of Human & Experimental Toxicology from 2003 to 2012 (2014)Assessing the scientific research product…A bibliometric analysis of toxicology research productivity in Middle Eastern Arab countries during a 10-year period (2003–2012) (2014)A bibliometric analysis of to…A bibliometric analysis of research productivity of Malaysian publications in leading toxicology journals during a 10-year period (2003–2012) (2014)A bibliometric analysis of re…Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors (2013)Bibliometrics of systematic r…Robust analysis of bibliometric data (2012)Robust analysis of bibliometr…From abstract to impact in cardiovascular research: factors predicting publication and citation (2012)From abstract to impact in ca…Which Data Base Should we Use for our Literature Analysis? Web of Science versus SCOPUS (2011)Which Data Base Should we Use…Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals (2009)Comparisons of Citations in W…Bibliometric analyses of biomedical research outputs in Lebanon and the United Arab Emirates 1988-2007 (2009)Bibliometric analyses of biom…SCImago Journal & Country Rank (2008)SCImago Journal & Country RankComparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…Concentration of the Most-Cited Papers in the Scientific Literature: Analysis of Journal Ecosystems (2006)Concentration of the Most-Cit…Essential Science IndicatorsSM (2005)Essential Science IndicatorsSMBibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfall…Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals: what do the numbers really mean? (2003)Impact factors of forensic sc…Citation indexes do not reflect methodological quality in lung cancer randomised trials (2003)Citation indexes do not refle…Citation characteristics of research published in emergency medicine versus other scientific journals (2001)Citation characteristics of r…Estimates of global research productivity in using nicotine replacement therapy for tobacco cessation: a bibliometric study (2018)Estimates of global research …Research Output from Palestine (1995–2012): A Bibliometric Study (2014)Research Output from Palestin…Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation (2009)The 100 most cited publications in cardiac surgery: a bibliometric analysis (2014)The Role of Conferences on the Pathway to Academic Impact (2018)A bibliometric analysis of the 103 top-cited articles in endodontics (2019)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements (2023)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)International ranking systems for universities and institutions: a critical appraisal (2007)How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology? (2013)Revisiting the “American Social Science”-Mapping the Geography of International Relations (2013)The frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)Substance use disorders in Arab countries: research activity and bibliometric analysis (2014)A comparison of 17 author-level bibliometric indicators for researchers in Astronomy, Environmental Science, Philosophy and Public Health in Web of Science and Google Scholar (2015)The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity (2005)Public, environmental, and occupational health research activity in Arab countries: bibliometric, citation, and collaboration analysis (2015)Scientific publications from Arab world in leading journals of Integrative and Complementary Medicine: a bibliometric analysis (2015)The Arab region’s contribution to global COVID-19 research: Bibliometric and visualization analysis (2021)Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics (1969)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor (2006)Journal impact factors: implications for the nursing profession (2007)From Forensics to Forensic Science (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Citation analysis as a literature search method for systematic reviews (2015)Factors Affecting Workforce Turnover in the Construction Sector: A Systematic Review (2019)Factors associating with or predicting more cited or higher quality journal articles: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper (2023)Planning local economic development: theory and practice (2002)Foreign-born scientists: mobility patterns for 16 countries (2012)Regression assumptions in clinical psychology research practice—a systematic review of common misconceptions (2017)Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometrics (2019)A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques (2017)Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases (2019)Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis (2020)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
  • 2005Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities886 cited
  • 2009Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals819 cited
  • 2008SCImago Journal & Country Rank206 cited
  • 2013Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors122 cited
  • 2006Concentration of the Most-Cited Papers in the Scientific Literature: Analysis of Journal Ecosystems121 cited
  • 2012Robust analysis of bibliometric data95 cited
  • 2014A bibliometric analysis of toxicology research productivity in Middle Eastern Arab countries during a 10-year period (2003–2012)87 cited
  • 2012From abstract to impact in cardiovascular research: factors predicting publication and citation77 cited
  • 2003Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals: what do the numbers really mean?72 cited
  • 2005Essential Science IndicatorsSM66 cited
  • 2011Which Data Base Should we Use for our Literature Analysis? Web of Science versus SCOPUS53 cited
  • 2009Bibliometric analyses of biomedical research outputs in Lebanon and the United Arab Emirates 1988-200752 cited
  • 2014A bibliometric analysis of research productivity of Malaysian publications in leading toxicology journals during a 10-year period (2003–2012)

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

46 cited
  • 2003Citation indexes do not reflect methodological quality in lung cancer randomised trials38 cited
  • 2001Citation characteristics of research published in emergency medicine versus other scientific journals37 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Estimates of global research productivity in using nicotine replacement therapy for tobacco cessation: a bibliometric study14 cited
    • 2014Research Output from Palestine (1995–2012): A Bibliometric Study13 cited