Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Informed peer review and uninformed bibliometrics?

2 references·8 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2006The top eight percent: development of approved and rejected applicants for a prestigious grant in Sweden65 cited
2008Funding of young scientist and scientific excellence53 cited

Cited by

2020Mapping career patterns in research: A sequence analysis of career histories of ERC applicants22 cited
2011A comment to the paper by Waltman et al., Scientometrics, 87, 467–481, 201120 cited
2012Characterizing researchers to study research funding agency impacts: The case of the European Research Council's Starting Grants20 cited
2014Analysing robustness and uncertainty levels of bibliometric performance statistics supporting science policy. A case study evaluating Danish postdoctoral funding17 cited
2020Bibliometrically Disciplined Peer Review: on Using Indicators in Research Evaluation15 cited
2020University characteristics and probabilities for funding of proposals in the European Framework Programs12 cited
2014What difference does it make? Impact of peer-reviewed scholarships on scientific production11 cited
2015Understanding and Assessing the Impact and Outcomes of the ERC and its Funding Schemes (EURECIA)8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work