SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science
13 references·4 citing·30 second hop
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science (2011)The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement …Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology (2011)Constitutional Moments in Gov…Verzuiling, pacificatie en kentering in de Nederlandse politiek (2008)Verzuiling, pacificatie en ke…Asilomar 1975: DNA modification secured (2008)Asilomar 1975: DNA modificati…See-through Science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream (2004)See-through Science: Why publ…Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science (1999)Participatory technology asse…Public Understanding of Science (1995)Public Understanding of Scien…Public participation in science : the role of consensus conferences in Europe (1995)Public participation in scien…Handbook of science mad Technology Studies, Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Petersen, J. y Pinch, T. (comps.), London, New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1995, 820 páginas (1995)Handbook of science mad Techn…Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (1995)Handbook of Science and Techn…The Making of the New Environmental Consciousness: A Comparative Study of the Environmental Movements in Sweden, Denmark, and the Netherlands. (1994)The Making of the New Environ…The public understanding of science (1989)The public understanding of s…The Public Understanding of Science (1986)The Public Understanding of S…Science and Society (1969)Science and SocietyInstitutionalizing public engagement in research and innovation: Toward the construction of institutional entrepreneurial collectives (2022)Institutionalizing public eng…Adapting RRI public engagement indicators to the Spanish scientific and innovation context: a participatory methodology based on AHP and content analysis (2022)Adapting RRI public engagemen…Public engagement in responsible research and innovation (2017)Public engagement in responsi…Responsible scientists and a citizens' panel: new storylines for creative engagement between science and the public (2013)Responsible scientists and a …“Opening Up” and “Closing Down” (2007)Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda (2007)Changing the intellectual climate (2014)The measurement of civic scientific literacy (1998)Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview (2000)Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis (2007)What is research collaboration? (1997)Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications (2003)Why We Disagree about Climate Change (2009)International Governance of Autonomous Military Robots (2014)Stakeholder Engagement, Knowledge Problems and Ethical Challenges (2020)The Privatization of AI Research(-ers): Causes and Potential Consequences -- From university-industry interaction to public research brain-drain? (2021)Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained (2007)Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects (2011)Developing a framework for responsible innovation (2013)Consuming, Engaging and Confronting Science (2003)Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology (2016)Politics and porn: how news media characterizes problems presented by deepfakes (2020)Public Attitudes toward Emerging Technologies (2005)Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public: Understanding U.S. Opinion on Agricultural Biotechnology (2006)Patterns in Students’ Argumentation Confronted with a Risk‐focused Socio‐scientific Issue (2006)Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science (2005)Deliberating in the Real World (2006)Democracy and Expertise (2009)The political science of risk perception (1998)Drought, debate, and uncertainty: measuring reporters' knowledge and ignorance about climate change (2000)Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology (2009)Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority (1996)Testing Public (Un)Certainty of Science (2004)Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995Handbook of Science and Technology Studies2,394 cited
  • 2004See-through Science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream785 cited
  • 1989The public understanding of science732 cited
  • 1995Public participation in science : the role of consensus conferences in Europe506 cited
  • 1969Science and Society489 cited
  • 1986The Public Understanding of Science373 cited
  • 1995Handbook of science mad Technology Studies, Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Petersen, J. y Pinch, T. (comps.), London, New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1995, 820 páginas289 cited
  • 1995Public Understanding of Science276 cited
  • 1999Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science224 cited
  • 2008Asilomar 1975: DNA modification secured192 cited
  • 2008Verzuiling, pacificatie en kentering in de Nederlandse politiek187 cited
  • 1994The Making of the New Environmental Consciousness: A Comparative Study of the Environmental Movements in Sweden, Denmark, and the Netherlands.182 cited
  • 2011Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology178 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Institutionalizing public engagement in research and innovation: Toward the construction of institutional entrepreneurial collectives16 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2017Public engagement in responsible research and innovation9 cited
  • 2022Adapting RRI public engagement indicators to the Spanish scientific and innovation context: a participatory methodology based on AHP and content analysis8 cited
  • 2013Responsible scientists and a citizens' panel: new storylines for creative engagement between science and the public8 cited