WHAT THEY DO WHEN THEY GET YOUR MANUSCRIPT: A SURVEY OF ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWER PRACTICES.

Lawrence R. Jauch · Jerry L. Wall

43 citations0/0 files storedAcademy of Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

This study seeks to promote an understanding of the practices of reviewers for the Academy of Management's Journal (AMJ) and Review (AMR). A survey of reviewers for the two journals revealed that t...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 43 citations exist upstream.

References

1987Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception 1978Evaluating psychological research reports: Dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgments.1978The scientific publication system in social science 1977Manuscript Characteristics Which Influence Acceptance for Management and Social Science Journals 1978Editorial Policies and Practices Among Leading Journals in Four Scientific Fields 1982Editorial: Some Remarks From the Outgoing Editor.1977Paradigm Development and Particularism: Journal Publication in Three Scientific Disciplines 1974Interreferee agreement on some characteristics of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Cited by

1990Problems with Research by Organizational Scholars on Issues of Race and Ethnicity 1997A violation of assumptions: Why TQM won't work in the ivory tower 1997REVIEWER AND EDITOR DECISION MAKING IN THE JOURNAL REVIEW PROCESS 2015Revising as Reframing 1993Determinants of academic recognition: The case of the Journal of Applied Psychology.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.