SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
WHAT THEY DO WHEN THEY GET YOUR MANUSCRIPT: A SURVEY OF ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWER PRACTICES.
11 references·16 citing·36 second hop
WHAT THEY DO WHEN THEY GET YOUR MANUSCRIPT: A SURVEY OF ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWER PRACTICES. (1989)WHAT THEY DO WHEN THEY GET YOUR MANUSCRIP…Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception (1987)Socially Desirable Responding…Publishing in the Organizational Sciences. (1986)Publishing in the Organizatio…Editorial: Some Remarks From the Outgoing Editor. (1982)Editorial: Some Remarks From …A Manuscript Masquerade (1980)A Manuscript MasqueradeThe scientific publication system in social science (1978)The scientific publication sy…Interrater agreement on manuscript is not so badp. (1978)Interrater agreement on manus…Evaluating psychological research reports: Dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgments. (1978)Evaluating psychological rese…Editorial Policies and Practices Among Leading Journals in Four Scientific Fields (1978)Editorial Policies and Practi…Paradigm Development and Particularism: Journal Publication in Three Scientific Disciplines (1977)Paradigm Development and Part…Manuscript Characteristics Which Influence Acceptance for Management and Social Science Journals (1977)Manuscript Characteristics Wh…Interreferee agreement on some characteristics of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. (1974)Interreferee agreement on som…On the Nature and Role of Peer Review in Mathematics (2016)On the Nature and Role of Pee…Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals (2016)Improving the peer-review pro…Revising as Reframing (2015)Revising as ReframingUs, Them, and Others in Management Research (2014)Us, Them, and Others in Manag…Reviewers are not perfect but could they try harder? (2013)Reviewers are not perfect but…Manuscript peer review: A guide for advanced practice nurses (2010)Manuscript peer review: A gui…The determinants of a successful accounting manuscript: Views of the informed (2008)The determinants of a success…Editorial boards in accounting: The power and the glory (2006)Editorial boards in accountin…The Performance of Peer Review and a Beauty Contest of Referee Processes of Economics Journals (2005)The Performance of Peer Revie…Writing publishable papers (2003)Writing publishable papersREVIEWER AND EDITOR DECISION MAKING IN THE JOURNAL REVIEW PROCESS (1997)REVIEWER AND EDITOR DECISION …A violation of assumptions: Why TQM won't work in the ivory tower (1997)A violation of assumptions: W…Determinants of academic recognition: The case of the Journal of Applied Psychology. (1993)Determinants of academic reco…Expectations and Perceptions of the Peer Review Process: A Study of Four Agricultural Economics Journals (1992)Expectations and Perceptions …Problems with Research by Organizational Scholars on Issues of Race and Ethnicity (1990)Problems with Research by Org…Factors leading to the rejection of accountants' manuscripts (1990)Factors leading to the reject…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable (1993)The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s (2005)Exchange and Power in Social Life (2017)The subjective side of science (1975)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2002)Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability (2011)Managerial Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness. (1971)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Understanding the Importance of Organizational Resources to Explain Organizational Problems: Evidence from Nonprofit Sport Clubs in Germany (2012)Problematic Use of Social Networking Sites: Antecedents and Consequence from a Dual-System Theory Perspective (2016)The dual concept of consumer value in social media brand community: A trust transfer perspective (2021)A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. (1960)The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (1984)Research in Organizational Behavior. (1986)Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. (1996)A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. (1999)RECONSIDERING THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION CONTEXTS (2007)Social Theory and Social Structure (1958)Social Theory and Social Structure. (1958)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Evidence for consciousness-related anomalies in random physical systems (1989)We Have to Break Up (2009)A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study (1982)Women in Academic Science: Experimental Findings From Hiring Studies (2017)The good, the bad and the rude peer-review (2020)Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts (1987)From inductive to iterative grounded theory: Zipping the gap between process theory and process data (1997)Administrative Science As Socially Constructed Truth (2019)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review (2020)Reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist: A biostatistical assessment of the data. (1980)Interjudgmental reliability of reviews for the Journal of Educational Psychology. (1981)The Peer Review Process Used to Evaluate Manuscripts Submitted to Academic Journals (1989)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1987Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception694 cited
  • 1978Evaluating psychological research reports: Dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgments.257 cited
  • 1978The scientific publication system in social science247 cited
  • 1977Manuscript Characteristics Which Influence Acceptance for Management and Social Science Journals245 cited
  • 1978Editorial Policies and Practices Among Leading Journals in Four Scientific Fields226 cited
  • 1982Editorial: Some Remarks From the Outgoing Editor.206 cited
  • 1977Paradigm Development and Particularism: Journal Publication in Three Scientific Disciplines197 cited
  • 1974Interreferee agreement on some characteristics of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.169 cited
  • 1986Publishing in the Organizational Sciences.147 cited
  • 1980A Manuscript Masquerade94 cited
  • 1978Interrater agreement on manuscript is not so badp.75 cited

Cited by

  • 1990Problems with Research by Organizational Scholars on Issues of Race and Ethnicity72 cited
  • 1997A violation of assumptions: Why TQM won't work in the ivory tower52 cited
  • 1997REVIEWER AND EDITOR DECISION MAKING IN THE JOURNAL REVIEW PROCESS46 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2015Revising as Reframing39 cited
  • 1993Determinants of academic recognition: The case of the Journal of Applied Psychology.38 cited
  • 2003Writing publishable papers34 cited
  • 2016On the Nature and Role of Peer Review in Mathematics29 cited
  • 2016Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals26 cited
  • 2006Editorial boards in accounting: The power and the glory24 cited
  • 2010Manuscript peer review: A guide for advanced practice nurses23 cited
  • 1990Factors leading to the rejection of accountants' manuscripts16 cited
  • 2008The determinants of a successful accounting manuscript: Views of the informed15 cited
  • 1992Expectations and Perceptions of the Peer Review Process: A Study of Four Agricultural Economics Journals11 cited
  • 2005The Performance of Peer Review and a Beauty Contest of Referee Processes of Economics Journals11 cited
  • 2014Us, Them, and Others in Management Research10 cited
  • 2013Reviewers are not perfect but could they try harder?7 cited