The paradox and promise of small group communication revisited

Ernest G. Bormann

17 citations0/0 files storedCentral States Speech Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Communication Studies and Media Qualitative Research Methods and Applications Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods

Abstract

Too many scholars continue to use an inappropriate and barren approach to the social scientific study of small group communication. This essay describes the variable analytic approach, indicates why it ought to be discredited, and suggests some better ways of doing research.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.

References

2017The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1951The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness 1939Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created “Social Climates”2017Communication And Persuasion 2002The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1965The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science.1953Group Dynamics: Research and Theory.1954Communication and persuasion

Cited by

1994Introduction: Revitalizing the study of small group communication 1994The future of small group communication research: Revitalization or continued good health?1994On interlinking language games: New opportunities for group communication research

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.