SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Methodological quality assessment of paper-based systematic reviews published in oral health
16 references·5 citing·43 second hop
Methodological quality assessment of paper-based systematic reviews published in oral health (2015)Methodological quality assessment of pape…Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions (2015)Using data sources beyond Pub…Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm? (2012)Cochrane and non-Cochrane sys…A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2012)A PRISMA assessment of the re…Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2011)Evaluation of methodology and…From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence- Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance~!2009-10-24~!2009-10-03~!2010-07-16~! (2010)From Systematic Reviews to Cl…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2005)Understanding systematic revi…Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. (2005)Understanding interobserver a…The assessment of systematic reviews in dentistry (2003)The assessment of systematic …Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1994)Users' guides to the medical …Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1994)Users' Guides to the Medical …Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Systematic Review: Why source…Methodological assessment and overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews with network meta‐analyses in Endodontics (2022)Methodological assessment and…There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology (2021)There is still room for impro…Critical analysis of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of antibiotics in third molar surgeries using AMSTAR 2 (2020)Critical analysis of methodol…Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR (2018)Quality assessment of systema…Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals (2018)Critical appraisal of methodo…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Consensus measurement in Delphi studies (2012)Content Analysis (2015)National Trends in the Prevalence and Treatment of Depression in Adolescents and Young Adults (2016)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)Socioeconomic Inequalities in Depression: A Meta-Analysis (2003)Long-term mental health of war-refugees: a systematic literature review (2015)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) (1997)Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders (1997)Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making (2005)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study (2017)Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality (2017)Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews (2021)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (2000)How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2005Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.7,009 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 1994Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated1,016 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 1994Users' Guides to the Medical Literature813 cited
  • 1994Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group486 cited
  • 2010From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence- Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance~!2009-10-24~!2009-10-03~!2010-07-16~!329 cited
  • 2005Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis317 cited
  • 2015Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions166 cited
  • 2003The assessment of systematic reviews in dentistry121 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2012A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics105 cited
  • 2012Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?95 cited
  • 2011Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics68 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Methodological assessment and overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews with network meta‐analyses in Endodontics24 cited
    • 2018Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals22 cited
    • 2020Critical analysis of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of antibiotics in third molar surgeries using AMSTAR 218 cited
    • 2021There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology16 cited
    • 2018Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR14 cited