The Philosophical Entente of Particulars:

Abstract

That the philosophical tenets of scholastic nominalism underwrite Chaucer’s poetry has been firmly established in Chaucer studies, yet whether Chaucer’s allegiance on the question of universals lies with realist or nominalist epistemology—or with neither—still remains a point of critical contention.1 This philosophical problem of universals structures the conflicts of Chaucer’s eponymous heroes in Troilus and Criseyde, who oscillate between

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.