SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Jumping to negative conclusions – a case of study-gathering bias? · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleJumping to negative conclusions – a case of study-gathering bias?

Steffen Moritz2015

Article2015

Jumping to negative conclusions – a case of study-gathering bias?

Steffen Moritz · Mahesh Menon · Ryan P. Balzan · Todd Stephen Woodward

8 citations·0/0 files stored·Psychological Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

References

2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsreview · 2 shared references 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statementreview · 2 shared references 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanationreview · 2 shared references 2010Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statementreview · 2 shared references 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approachreview · 2 shared references 2010Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisisarticle · 2 shared references

Details

Year2015

Typearticle

Published2015-10-22

VenuePsychological Medicine

ISSN-L0033-2917

Languageen

Citations8

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1017/s0033291715002068

openalex_workW2175886830

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.