Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Attitudinal Decision Making in the Supreme Court of Canada

2 references·16 citing·52 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1994A Reappraisal of Diversification in the Federal Courts: Gender Effects in the Courts of Appeals171 cited
1991Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916-88120 cited

Cited by

2013Proportionality and Constitutional Culture203 cited
2010Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia72 cited
2011Attitudinal and Neo-Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel43 cited
2013Diversity, Deliberation, and Judicial Opinion Writing39 cited
2019Hybrid Constitutionalism35 cited
2009Ideological Consistency and Attitudinal Conf lict30 cited
2011The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the U.S. Courts of Appeals26 cited
2010Strategic Legitimacy Cultivation at the Supreme Court of Canada: QuebecSecession Referenceand Beyond23 cited
2008The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the United States Courts of Appeals23 cited
2011Judge Gender, Critical Mass, and Decision Making in the Appellate Courts of Canada21 cited
2018Courts and informal networks: Towards a relational perspective on judicial politics outside Western democracies21 cited
2010

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Choices in Context: How Case-Level Factors Influence the Magnitude of Ideological Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court

21 cited

2011Explaining Dissent on the Supreme Court of Canada19 cited

2011Women Lawyers before the Supreme Court of Canada19 cited

2013Does Patronage Matter? Connecting Influences on Judicial Appointments with Judicial Decision Making18 cited

2011Is Bigger Always Better? On Optimal Panel Size, with Evidence from the Supreme Court of Canada16 cited