SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting Weaknesses in Conference Abstracts of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Ophthalmology
14 references·0 citing·55 second hop
Reporting Weaknesses in Conference Abstracts of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Ophthalmology (2015)Reporting Weaknesses in Conference Abstra…STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts (2017)STARD for Abstracts: essentia…Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Literature survey of high-imp…Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports (2014)Infrequent and incomplete reg…Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD (2013)Reporting quality of diagnost…PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporti…ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study (2013)ClinicalTrials.gov registrati…A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies (2013)A systematic review classifie…QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …No evidence of bias in the process of publication of diagnostic accuracy studies in stroke submitted as abstracts (2008)No evidence of bias in the pr…CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration (2008)CONSORT for reporting randomi…CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT for Reporting Randomi…Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Full publication of results i…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. (2012)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Some Improvements after 10 Years of STARD (2014)Synthesizing Evidence from Diagnostic Accuracy TEsts : the SEDATE guideline (2015)Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies (2019)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA (2016)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)How depressed is “depressed”? A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of optimal cut points for the Beck Depression Inventory revised (BDI-II) (2018)Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review (2018)Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update (2019)Analysing and Presenting Results (2010)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy (2020)Transparent Reporting of Multivariable Prediction Models in Journal and Conference Abstracts: TRIPOD for Abstracts (2020)Searching for and selecting studies (2023)Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)CONSORT 2010: Aktualisierte Leitlinie für Berichte randomisierter Studien im Parallelgruppen-Design (2011)Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews (2013)Impact of Low Back Pain Clinical Trials Measured by the Altmetric Score: Cross-Sectional Study (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,163 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
  • 2007Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts996 cited
  • 2013PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts706 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
  • 2013A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies283 cited
  • 2013Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD119 cited
  • 2017STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts77 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration53 cited
  • 2008No evidence of bias in the process of publication of diagnostic accuracy studies in stroke submitted as abstracts35 cited
  • 2013ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study31 cited
  • 2015Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

29 cited
  • 2014Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports27 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.