No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This study used item response data from 30 countries who participated in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). It compared reduction of proportion of item misfit associated with alternative item response theory (IRT; multidimensional and multi-parameter Rasch and 2 parameter logistic; 2PL) models and linking (mean-mean IRT vs. Lagrangian multiplier and concurrent calibration) approaches to those currently used by PISA to conduct score scale calibrations. The analyses are conducted with the general diagnostic model (GDM), which is a modeling framework that contains all IRT models used in the paper as special cases. The paper also investigated whether the use of an alternative score scale (i.e., a scale that includes the use of international and a subset of country-specific parameters) as compared to the use of solely international parameters for country score scale calibrations led to improvement of fit. Analyses were conducted using discrete mixture distribution IRT as well as multiple group (M-)IRT models. As compared to a scale that uses all international parameters, substantial improvement of fit was obtained using the concurrent calibration linking approach with the multi-group 2PL model allowing for partially-unique country parameters.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 108 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.