Innocent Statements and Their Metaphysically Loaded Counterparts

Abstract

Why is it trivial to conclude that there are properties, propositions, and natural numbers? This chapter begins to answer this question by looking at the relationship between ordinary, metaphysically innocent statements like “Fido is a dog” and their metaphysically loaded counterparts, like “Fido has the property of being a dog.” It proposes that both in such pairs have the same truth conditions and refer to the same things, but they have a different focus effect that is tied to their syntax, analogous to a paradigmatic focus construction like a cleft construction. This allows for the spelling out of Frege’s metaphor of carving contents. An appendix discusses more advanced topics like asymmetric identity statements and concealed questions.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 50 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.