The production of quick scoping reviews and rapid evidence assessments: a how to guide

Deborah Coughlin · James Miller

80 citations0/0 files storedNERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Health Sciences Research and Education Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

This document contains a brief overview of the different Evidence Reviews (ER) but is written primarily for those intending to commission and/or produce an ER in the form of Quick Scoping Reviews (QSR) or Rapid Evidence Assessments (REA), that lie between literature reviews and SRs in terms of rigour of assessment. These have been found to be well suited to meet the evidence challenges most frequently faced by the authors in meeting policy and practice evidence requirements.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 80 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2020Research priorities for the COVID‐19 pandemic and beyond: A call to action for psychological science 2015Financing the UK power sector: Is the money available?2015Systematic reviews: Separating fact from fiction 2022Systematic reviews: A glossary for public health 2020Assessing the risk of bias in choice of search sources for environmental meta‐analyses 2020The CEEDER database of evidence reviews: An open-access evidence service for researchers and decision-makers 2022Rapid Evidence Assessment: Mentoring Interventions for/by Students with Disabilities at Third-Level Education 2022Time for change? Recurrent barriers to music education

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.