SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The production of quick scoping reviews and rapid evidence assessments: a how to guide
0 references·8 citing·40 second hop
The production of quick scoping reviews and rapid evidence assessments: a how to guide (2015)The production of quick scoping reviews a…Time for change? Recurrent barriers to music education (2022)Time for change? Recurrent ba…Systematic reviews: A glossary for public health (2022)Systematic reviews: A glossar…Rapid Evidence Assessment: Mentoring Interventions for/by Students with Disabilities at Third-Level Education (2022)Rapid Evidence Assessment: Me…The CEEDER database of evidence reviews: An open-access evidence service for researchers and decision-makers (2020)The CEEDER database of eviden…Research priorities for the COVID‐19 pandemic and beyond: A call to action for psychological science (2020)Research priorities for the C…Assessing the risk of bias in choice of search sources for environmental meta‐analyses (2020)Assessing the risk of bias in…Systematic reviews: Separating fact from fiction (2015)Systematic reviews: Separatin…Financing the UK power sector: Is the money available? (2015)Financing the UK power sector…Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have (1984)The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field (2001)Social Research Methods (2008)The different types of renewable energy finance: A Bibliometric analysis (2020)Identification of key influencing factors to Chinese coal power enterprises transition in the context of carbon neutrality: A modified fuzzy DEMATEL approach (2022)Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. (1977)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Meta-analysis of Systematic Literature Review Methods (2019)Improving scientific rigour in conservation evaluations and a plea deal for transparency on potential biases (2020)Can public awareness, knowledge and engagement improve climate change adaptation policies? (2021)Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta‐analyses relating to achievement (2009)Longitudinal changes in anxiety and psychological distress, and associated risk and protective factors during the first three months of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Germany (2020)Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science (2020)The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence (2020)The role of psychological flexibility in the context of COVID-19: Associations with depression, anxiety, and insomnia (2020)The Global Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety, Stress, and Insomnia Among General Population During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2022)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Potential types of bias when estimating causal effects in environmental research and how to interpret them (2024)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Clarifying differences between review designs and methods (2012)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Acting in the face of evidentiary ambiguity, bias, and absence arising from systematic reviews in applied environmental science (2021)Can open access increase LIS research’s policy impact? Using regression analysis and causal inference (2023)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Revisões sistemáticas e outros tipos de síntese: comentários à série metodológica publicada na Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde (2022)Types and associated methodologies of overviews of reviews in health care: a methodological study with published examples (2022)Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper (2023)Dropping in and dropping out: experiences of sustaining and ceasing amateur participation in classical music (2016)Pupils’ perceptions of informal learning in school music lessons (2016)Editorial Research: Music education in a time of pandemic (2020)Teacher habitus as/at the nexus of practice: Musical Futures and Irish primary schools (2023)Who has access to a career in Western classical music? Building a tool to evaluate intersectionality in barriers to music education and careers (2024)Mentoring and Undergraduate Academic Success: A Literature Review (1991)Research Methods in Education (2002)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Peer Mentoring Circles in higher education: perceptions of their members with and without disability and program proposal (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2020Research priorities for the COVID‐19 pandemic and beyond: A call to action for psychological science210 cited
  • 2015Financing the UK power sector: Is the money available?47 cited
  • 2015Systematic reviews: Separating fact from fiction45 cited
  • 2022Systematic reviews: A glossary for public health29 cited
  • 2020Assessing the risk of bias in choice of search sources for environmental meta‐analyses28 cited
  • 2020The CEEDER database of evidence reviews: An open-access evidence service for researchers and decision-makers25 cited
  • 2022Rapid Evidence Assessment: Mentoring Interventions for/by Students with Disabilities at Third-Level Education22 cited
  • 2022Time for change? Recurrent barriers to music education18 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work