SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Qualité des publications en chirurgie plastique
12 references·0 citing·48 second hopsampled
Qualité des publications en chirurgie plastique (2015)Qualité des publications en chirurgie pla…So, You Want to Improve Your Plastic Surgery Papers? Introducing PRS’ Friendly EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines (2015)So, You Want to Improve Your …Reporting Quality of Observational Studies in Plastic Surgery Needs Improvement (2015)Reporting Quality of Observat…Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines (2014)Basic statistical reporting f…Levels of Evidence in Cosmetic Surgery (2013)Levels of Evidence in Cosmeti…Evidence-Based Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (2013)Evidence-Based Plastic and Re…The evidence base for oral and maxillofacial surgery: 10-year analysis of two journals (2010)The evidence base for oral an…A Detailed Analysis of Level I Evidence (Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-Analyses) in Five Plastic Surgery Journals to Date: 1978 to 2009 (2010)A Detailed Analysis of Level …The EQUATOR Network and the PRISMA Statement for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2009)The EQUATOR Network and the P…Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: Survey of output and quality of reporting (2006)Randomised clinical trials in…Quality of Reports of Randomized Clinical Trials in Plastic Surgery (2005)Quality of Reports of Randomi…Full Publication of Papers Presented at the 1995 through 1999 European Association of Plastic Surgeons Annual Scientific Meetings: A Systemic Bibliometric Analysis (2004)Full Publication of Papers Pr…Analysis of Publications in Three Plastic Surgery Journals for the Year 2002 (2004)Analysis of Publications in T…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)The Past Informs the Present, Academic New Media Pitfalls: A Primer for Plastic Surgeons (2019)The 100 Most-cited Articles in Abdominoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis (2021)Five decades of research on immediate implant therapy: A modern bibliometric network analysis via Altmetric and level of evidence mapping (2024)Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)The Journal “Impact Factor” (1998)Evidence-Based Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2008)Open Access Publishing: A Study of Current Practice in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Research (2016)Levels of evidence and journal impact factor in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a 15-year follow-up (2020)The level of evidence, scientific impact and social impact of clinical studies in periodontology: A methodological study (2020)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A 20-Year Review of Reporting Standards, Methodologic Quality, and Impact (2008)A Systematic Review of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials (2016)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies (2014)The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery (2017)STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery (2019)STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011)How to Write a Systematic Review (2013)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Full Publication of Results Initially Presented in Abstracts (1994)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals (2002)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)SUS/AAS abstracts: what is the scientific impact? (2008)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2018)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine: A longitudinal study of 16 US medical specialties (2018)Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology (2018)Bayesian Analysis Reporting Guidelines (2021)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery needs improvement: A systematic review (2012)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials (1999)Levels of evidence in plastic surgery—bibliometric trends and comparison with five other surgical specialties (2016)Evidence-Based Medicine in Plastic Surgery (2017)Publication Rates and Author Characteristics From 3 Plastic Surgery Journals in 2006 and 2016 (2018)Controlled Trials in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: A 16-Year Analysis (2007)Journal Impact Factor versus the Evidence Level of Articles Published in Plastic Surgery Journals (2014)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2014Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines670 cited
  • 2015Reporting Quality of Observational Studies in Plastic Surgery Needs Improvement55 cited
  • 2010A Detailed Analysis of Level I Evidence (Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-Analyses) in Five Plastic Surgery Journals to Date: 1978 to 200951 cited
  • 2006Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: Survey of output and quality of reporting46 cited
  • 2013Levels of Evidence in Cosmetic Surgery45 cited
  • 2004Full Publication of Papers Presented at the 1995 through 1999 European Association of Plastic Surgeons Annual Scientific Meetings: A Systemic Bibliometric Analysis35 cited
  • 2005Quality of Reports of Randomized Clinical Trials in Plastic Surgery29 cited
  • 2010The evidence base for oral and maxillofacial surgery: 10-year analysis of two journals26 cited
  • 2009The EQUATOR Network and the PRISMA Statement for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses23 cited
  • 2013Evidence-Based Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery19 cited
  • 2004Analysis of Publications in Three Plastic Surgery Journals for the Year 200219 cited
  • 2015So, You Want to Improve Your Plastic Surgery Papers? Introducing PRS’ Friendly EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines8 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work