Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Aftermath of Daubert (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993)): An Evolving Jurisprudence of Expert Evidence

0 references·16 citing·50 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

2016The identification of living persons on images: A literature review42 cited
2020Getting Rid of Dichotomous Sex Estimations: Why Logistic Regression Should be Preferred Over Discriminant Function Analysis39 cited
2007A logical framework to ballpoint ink dating interpretation38 cited
2012Can Projective Drawings Detect if a Child Experienced Sexual or Physical Abuse?34 cited
2009Attachment Methodology in Custody Evaluation: Four Hurdles Standing Between Developmental Theory and Forensic Application29 cited
2001The use of psychological tests by Australian psychologists who do assessments for the courts27 cited
1999What Counts for Identity? The Historical Origins of the Methodology of Latent Fingerprint Identification25 cited
2004Evaluating the Probative Value of Child Custody Evaluations23 cited
2005Review of “The Ackerman-Schoendorf Scales for Parent Evaluation of Custody” (ASPECT)22 cited
2002Guidelines for Forensic Application of the MCMI-III21 cited
2004The operating characteristics of the major HRNES-R measures19 cited
2008On Being an Expert Witness: It's not about you17 cited
2005Use of Psychological Tests in Child Custody Assessment15 cited
2013Does the R-PAS Meet Standards for Forensic Use? Considerations with Introducing a New Rorschach Coding System

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

13 cited

2005Revisiting the Need for Reform in the Disclosure of Tests and Raw Test Data to the Courts: The 2002 APA Ethics Code Has Not Solved Our Dilemma6 cited

2007Commentary on “A motion to exclude and the ‘fixed’ versus ‘flexible’ battery in ‘forensic’ neuropsychology”5 cited