Citation map · Study

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

6 references·16 citing·46 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
1998Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports334 cited
1998US and Non-US Submissions318 cited
1998Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?146 cited
1999Evidence on peer review—scientific quality control or smokescreen?97 cited

2006Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies74 cited
2008Perfect Study, Poor Evidence: Interpretation of Biases Preceding Study Design72 cited
2006Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications71 cited
2011Journal peer review in context: A qualitative study of the social and subjective dimensions of manuscript review in biomedical publishing68 cited
2015Catastrophism, Uniformitarianism, and a Scientific Realism Debate That Makes a Difference66 cited
2016Peer Review and Scholarly Originality63 cited
2017Peer review in forensic science52 cited
2017The perceived feasibility of methods to reduce publication bias51 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work