Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Systematic comparison of study quality criteria

12 references·10 citing·32 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,709 cited
2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
2011GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)2,798 cited
2011GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision2,681 cited
2011GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency2,318 cited
2011GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness1,838 cited
2011GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias1,817 cited
2011GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence1,335 cited
2017Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions448 cited
2014The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes426 cited

Cited by

2017Framework for the quantitative weight-of-evidence analysis of ‘omics data for regulatory purposes

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

44 cited

2020Draft for internal testing Scientific Committee guidance on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments26 cited

2020Facilitation of risk assessment with evidence-based methods – A framework for use of systematic mapping and systematic reviews in determining hazard, developing toxicity values, and characterizing uncertainty21 cited

2020Evaluating reliability and risk of bias of in vivo animal data for risk assessment of chemicals – Exploring the use of the SciRAP tool in a systematic review context21 cited

2017Using systematic review in occupational safety and health19 cited

2020Systematically evaluating and integrating evidence in National Ambient Air Quality Standards reviews10 cited

2018The study design elements employed by researchers in preclinical animal experiments from two research domains and implications for automation of systematic reviews9 cited

2023Critical appraisal tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro cell culture studies: A methodological study7 cited

2024Triangulation of epidemiological evidence and risk of bias evaluation: A proposed framework and applied example using formaldehyde exposure and risk of myeloid leukemias6 cited

2023The role of study quality in aspartame and cancer epidemiology study reviews6 cited