SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A mixed-methods approach to systematic reviews
3 references·16 citing·51 second hop
A mixed-methods approach to systematic reviews (2015)A mixed-methods approach to systematic re…Defining and Designing Mixed Research Synthesis Studies. (2006)Defining and Designing Mixed …Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come (2004)Mixed Methods Research: A Res…Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews (2004)Integrating qualitative resea…The role of scoping reviews in reducing research waste (2022)The role of scoping reviews i…Risk Perception towards COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis (2022)Risk Perception towards COVID…Rapid reviews and the methodological rigor of evidence synthesis: a JBI position statement (2022)Rapid reviews and the methodo…Interventions to reduce loneliness and social isolation in rural settings: A mixed-methods review (2022)Interventions to reduce lonel…Do Interventions Reducing Social Vulnerability Improve Health in Community Dwelling Older Adults? A Systematic Review (2022)Do Interventions Reducing Soc…CAT HPPR: a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of systematic, rapid, and scoping reviews investigating interventions in health promotion and prevention (2022)CAT HPPR: a critical appraisa…Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews (2021)Methodological guidance for t…Joint displays for qualitative-quantitative synthesis in mixed methods reviews (2021)Joint displays for qualitativ…It’s Not Just What You Do but the Way You Do It: A Systematic Review of Process Evaluation of Interventions to Improve Gross Motor Competence (2021)It’s Not Just What You Do but…Tipos de revisão de literatura: considerações das editoras do Journal of Nursing and Health / Types of literature review: considerations of the editors of the Journal of Nursing and Health (2020)Tipos de revisão de literatur…‘Into the Wild’: A meta-synthesis of talking therapy in natural outdoor spaces (2020)‘Into the Wild’: A meta-synth…SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF MIXED METHODS: METHOD OF RESEARCH FOR THE INCORPORATION OF EVIDENCE IN NURSING (2019)SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF MIXED ME…Developing methods for the overarching synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence: The interweave synthesis approach (2019)Developing methods for the ov…The systematic review: Plurality of approaches and methodologies (2018)The systematic review: Plural…La revisión sistemática: pluralidad de enfoques y metodologías (2018)La revisión sistemática: plur…Conceptual recommendations for selecting the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to answer research questions related to complex evidence (2016)Conceptual recommendations fo…Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically (2002)Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. (2005)Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field (2005)The Validity Issue in Mixed Research (2006)Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings (2007)Understanding Factors that Shape Gender Attitudes in Early Adolescence Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review (2016)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings (2017)Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods (2019)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained (2007)Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research (2007)Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures (2009)Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Qualitative research synthesis (2015)The critical interpretive synthesis: an assessment of reporting practices (2020)What are the social outcomes of climate policies? A systematic map and review of the ex-post literature (2020)Talent development environments within sports: a scoping review examining functional and dysfunctional environmental features (2022)The integrative review: updated methodology (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Scoping review of evidence synthesis: Concepts, types and methods (2025)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Nature’s Role in Outdoor Therapies: An Umbrella Review (2021)Space and Well-Being in High Security Environments (2022)The role of natural landscapes for facilitating coaching: Exploratory findings from walking coaching experiences (2023)Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? (2010)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)Repercussões da personalidade no envelhecimento: norteadores do desenvolvimento humano (2023)Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods (2005)Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice (2005)Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool ( MMAT ) (2018)Built and natural environment correlates of physical activity of adults living in rural areas: a systematic review (2024)Virtual reality: A review and a new framework for integrated adoption (2024)Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data (2015)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Rapid review method series: interim guidance for the reporting of rapid reviews (2024)A scoping review and expert consensus on digital determinants of health (2025)Digital public health interventions for the promotion of mental well-being and health behaviors among university students: a rapid review (2025)Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. (1989)The theory of planned behavior (1991)The evolution of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from panel survey data (2023)The impact of risk perception and institutional trust on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in China (2024)Unveiling the Influence of TikTok Dependency on University Students’ Post-COVID-19 Health Protective Behavior (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come11,161 cited
  • 2004Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews515 cited
  • 2006Defining and Designing Mixed Research Synthesis Studies.485 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews210 cited
  • 2022Risk Perception towards COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis163 cited
  • 2020‘Into the Wild’: A meta-synthesis of talking therapy in natural outdoor spaces133 cited
  • 2020Tipos de revisão de literatura: considerações das editoras do Journal of Nursing and Health / Types of literature review: considerations of the editors of the Journal of Nursing and Health132 cited
  • 2016Conceptual recommendations for selecting the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to answer research questions related to complex evidence103 cited
  • 2022Rapid reviews and the methodological rigor of evidence synthesis: a JBI position statement81 cited
  • 2018La revisión sistemática: pluralidad de enfoques y metodologías58 cited
  • 2019SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF MIXED METHODS: METHOD OF RESEARCH FOR THE INCORPORATION OF EVIDENCE IN NURSING52 cited
  • 2022The role of scoping reviews in reducing research waste43 cited
  • 2022Interventions to reduce loneliness and social isolation in rural settings: A mixed-methods review38 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2021It’s Not Just What You Do but the Way You Do It: A Systematic Review of Process Evaluation of Interventions to Improve Gross Motor Competence37 cited
  • 2019Developing methods for the overarching synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence: The interweave synthesis approach34 cited
  • 2022Do Interventions Reducing Social Vulnerability Improve Health in Community Dwelling Older Adults? A Systematic Review33 cited
  • 2021Joint displays for qualitative-quantitative synthesis in mixed methods reviews22 cited
  • 2018The systematic review: Plurality of approaches and methodologies21 cited
  • 2022CAT HPPR: a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of systematic, rapid, and scoping reviews investigating interventions in health promotion and prevention18 cited