SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

On the stability of citation-based journal rankings · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleOn the stability of citation-based journal rankings

Dejan Pajić2015

Article2015

On the stability of citation-based journal rankings

62 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Informetrics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 62 citations exist upstream.

References

2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics 2010Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?2010A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator 2006Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review 2010Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals 2012How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management 2009New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation

Cited by

2017Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland 2018Scholarly impact assessment: a survey of citation weighting solutions 2017A multiple-link, mutually reinforced journal-ranking model to measure the prestige of journals 2022Educational Research Review From Diverse Perspectives: A Bibliometric Analysis of Web of Science (2011–2020)

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2015Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Managementother · 9 shared references 2016Evaluating journal quality: A review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and managementarticle · 7 shared references 2016Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art reportchapter · 7 shared references 2019Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometricschapter · 7 shared references 2017Citation-Based Journal Rankings: Key Questions, Metrics, and Data Sourcesarticle · 7 shared references 2015Aggregated journal–journal citation relations in scopus and web of science matched and compared in terms of networks, maps, and interactive overlaysarticle · 7 shared references

Details

Year2015

Typearticle

Published2015-10-01

VenueJournal of Informetrics

ISSN-L1751-1577

Languageen

Citations62

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.joi.2015.08.005

openalex_workW2249348384

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2021The lack of meaningful boundary differences between journal impact factor quartiles undermines their independent use in research evaluation

2022When a journal is both at the ‘top’ and the ‘bottom’: the illogicality of conflating citation-based metrics with quality

2020Beyond quality metrics: defying journal rankings as the philosopher’s stone of mathematics education research

2024“I'd like to publish in Q1, but there's no Q1 to be found”: Study of journal quartile distributions across subject categories and topics