Penal populism, sentencing councils and sentencing policy

Abstract

1. Penal populism: sentencing councils and sentencing policy, Arie Freiberg and Karen Gelb 2. Sentencing policy and practice: the evolving role of public opinion, Julian V. Roberts 3. Penal populism and penal scandal in New Zealand, John Pratt 4. Dealing the public in: challenges for a transparent and accountable sentencing policy, David Indermaur 5. Myths and misconceptions: public opinion versus public judgment about sentencing, Karen Gelb 6. The role of the public in sentencing policy development under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines, Richard S. Frase 7. The failures of the United States Sentencing Commission, Judge Nancy Gertner 8. English sentencing guidelines in their public and political context, Andrew Ashworth 9. The New South Wales Sentencing Council, The Hon Alan Abadee AM RFD QC 10. The Sentencing Commission for Scotland, Neil Hutton 11. The Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council: incorporating community views into the sentencing process, Arie Freiberg 12. A perspective on the work of the Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council and its potential to promote respect and equality for women, Therese McCarthy 13. Sentencing reform in New Zealand: a proposal to establish a sentencing council, Warren Young 14. Proposals for a sentencing council in South Africa, Stephan Terblanche 15. A federal sentencing council for Australia, Australian Law Reform Commission 16. Institutional mechanisms for incorporating the public in the development of sentencing policy, Neil Hutton 17. Does it matter? Reflections on the effectiveness of institutionalised public participation in the development of sentencing policy, Rob Allen and Mike Hough

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 75 citations exist upstream.