SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to review a surgical paper: a guide for junior referees
14 references·0 citing·39 second hop
How to review a surgical paper: a guide for junior referees (2016)How to review a surgical paper: a guide f…The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)The PRISMA Extension Statemen…Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials (2014)Why training and specializati…Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Relation of completeness of r…Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system (2014)Peer review for biomedical pu…Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD (2013)Reporting quality of diagnost…Meta-analysis: pitfalls and hints. (2013)Meta-analysis: pitfalls and h…A guide to writing case reports for the Journal of Medical Case Reports and BioMed Central Research Notes (2013)A guide to writing case repor…Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals (2012)Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged…Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)Effect of using reporting gui…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (2000)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews (1993)The characteristics of peer r…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement (2015)A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network (2016)CONSORT-Equity 2017 extension and elaboration for better reporting of health equity in randomised trials (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1986)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (2004)What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)Teaching and physics education research: bridging the gap (2014)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Does gratitude enhance prosociality?: A meta-analytic review. (2017)Effectiveness of Computer-Based Scaffolding in the Context of Problem-Based Learning for Stem Education: Bayesian Meta-analysis (2017)Prevalence of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress in war- and conflict-afflicted areas: A meta-analysis (2022)Grey Literature in Meta-Analyses (2003)Emotional intelligence in medicine: a systematic review through the context of the ACGME competencies (2010)Motivation Interventions in Education (2015)The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Report Guideline Development (2013)Ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: Declaración PRISMA-P 2015 (2016)Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019)Establishing a new journal for systematic review products (2012)Strengthening the Reporting of Molecular Epidemiology for Infectious Diseases (STROME-ID): an extension of the STROBE statement (2014)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 2015The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations8,248 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2000Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement416 cited
  • 2013Meta-analysis: pitfalls and hints.300 cited
  • 2011Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial291 cited
  • 2014Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review241 cited
  • 2012Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals200 cited
  • 1993The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews150 cited
  • 2013A guide to writing case reports for the Journal of Medical Case Reports and BioMed Central Research Notes123 cited
  • 2013Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD119 cited
  • 2014Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

103 cited
  • 2014Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials75 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.