The framing of knowledge transfers to shared R&D suppliers and its impact on innovation performance: a regulatory focus perspective

Abstract

When outsourcing research and development (R&D) services, fears of knowledge leakage can make client firms reluctant to transfer knowledge to their suppliers, even at the cost of reducing the performance of the agreement. Outsourcing to R&D suppliers shared with competitors ensures relying on refined capabilities due to the aggregation of the demands of related clients, but also aggravates this interorganizational learning dilemma. Taking a regulatory focus perspective, we argue that the client's commitment to the process of knowledge transfer with a shared supplier will depend on whether the relationship is framed with a promotion or a prevention focus. Using primary data at the transaction level from a survey conducted among 170 European and US technological firms, we find that sharing suppliers with competitors only boosts the client's innovative performance when outsourcing R&D services that do not require the transfer of tacit and firm‐specific knowledge. Otherwise, the appropriability hazards involved will make the firm frame the relationship with a prevention focus limiting the client's ability to achieve its innovation objectives.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.