Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

“It's Not You, It's the Room”—Are the High-Tech, Active Learning Classrooms Worth It?

6 references·14 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2004Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research7,318 cited
1999Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis1,941 cited
2006Where's the evidence that active learning works?1,656 cited
2005How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts?518 cited
2007The Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) project432 cited
2010Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning329 cited

Cited by

2017Comparison of high-technology active learning and low-technology active learning classrooms120 cited
2019A space for learning: An analysis of research on active learning spaces101 cited
2014DNA → RNA: What Do Students Think the Arrow Means?74 cited
2019Developing a smart classroom infrastructure to support real-time student collaboration and inquiry: a 4-year design study67 cited
2022Formal learning spaces in Higher Education – a systematic review66 cited
2019Hidden Identities Shape Student Perceptions of Active Learning Environments63 cited
2020In a “Scientist Spotlight” Intervention, Diverse Student Identities Matter62 cited
2018Contemporary Issues in Group Learning in Undergraduate Science Classrooms: A Perspective from Student Engagement

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

62 cited

2019College Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes in Technology-Enabled Active Learning Environments: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature62 cited

2016Does the Room Matter? Active Learning in Traditional and Enhanced Lecture Spaces54 cited

2017Do Biology MajorsReallyDiffer from Non–STEM Majors?53 cited

2016Student evaluations of physics teachers: On the stability and persistence of gender bias26 cited

2018Small group gender ratios impact biology class performance and peer evaluations20 cited

2016Gender gap or program gap? Students’ negotiations of study practice in a course in electromagnetism19 cited