Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Machine learning to assist risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews

16 references·16 citing·44 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
2010The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed503 cited
2014Systematic review automation technologies471 cited
2005Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification410 cited
2010Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews351 cited
2009Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study348 cited
2014Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation340 cited
2015RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials316 cited
2011Applications of text mining within systematic reviews212 cited
2005Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study209 cited
2012Testing the Risk of Bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs174 cited
2009Supporting Systematic Reviews Using Text Mining144 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2014

Poor Reliability between Cochrane Reviewers and Blinded External Reviewers When Applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool in Physical Therapy Trials

124 cited

2013Rapid evidence assessments of research to inform social policy: taking stock and moving forward109 cited

2010A new algorithm for reducing the workload of experts in performing systematic reviews100 cited

Cited by

2023The use of artificial intelligence for automating or semi-automating biomedical literature analyses: A scoping review64 cited
2022Automated medical literature screening using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis62 cited
2019Improving reference prioritisation with PICO recognition62 cited
2017Technology-assisted risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews: a prospective cross-sectional evaluation of the RobotReviewer machine learning tool54 cited
2019A randomized trial provided new evidence on the accuracy and efficiency of traditional vs. electronically annotated abstraction approaches in systematic reviews54 cited
2021Is Trauma Focused-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) Effective in Reducing Trauma Symptoms among Traumatized Refugee Children? A Systematic Review53 cited
2024Automation of systematic reviews of biomedical literature: a scoping review of studies indexed in PubMed48 cited
2023Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: Update of a living systematic review44 cited
2018Machine learning techniques for the automation of literature reviews and systematic reviews in EFSA36 cited
2020Future of evidence ecosystem series: 2. current opportunities and need for better tools and methods36 cited
2021Risk of bias assessment in preclinical literature using natural language processing36 cited
2023A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses31 cited
2025Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: Update of a living systematic review26 cited
2020Adjudication rather than experience of data abstraction matters more in reducing errors in abstracting data in systematic reviews26 cited
2025Digital Tools to Support the Systematic Review Process: An Introduction22 cited
2018Features and functioning of D ata A bstraction A ssistant, a software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews20 cited