Temporary agency workers shake a work community: a social capital perspective

Riitta Liisa Viitala · Jenni Kantola

22 citations0/0 files storedEmployee Relations

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Social Capital and Networks

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the kinds of effects that using a temporary agency workforce may cause on an organisational level, especially on relations between employees. In this study the authors explore the organisation as a community, leaning on the theory of social capital. Design/methodology/approach – The data were gathered via semi-structured interviews with 18 temporary agency workers and five employees in permanent positions. Discourse analysis with some degree of pragmatism was employed in comprehending the speech of the interviewees. Findings – The position of agency workers may be problematic from the perspective of social capital formulation in a work organisation. The short duration of contracts and different conditions of employment shake relations in a work group. Agency workers may also be outside the information flows. Additionally the norms and rules may be different for temporary and permanent employees and thus cause confusion. Research limitations/implications – The findings will hopefully provoke researchers to investigate the effects of using a temporary agency workforce in different organisational contexts. In addition, the study indicates that the theory of social capital is fruitful for investigating the topic on the organisational level. Practical implications – The use of agency workforce should be considered comprehensively in organisations. Its effects on work organisations may be conflicting. If temporary agency workers are needed as interim help, HRM practices should be developed in order to minimise the potential problems in terms of social capital. Originality/value – The study adopted an organisational perspective on the agency workforce, which is still rare in studies on the topic.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 22 citations exist upstream.

References

1985Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness 1988Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital 2000Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital 2002The Forms of Capital 1998Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage 1992Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology 1998Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology 1998Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust

Cited by

2020Ambidextrous Knowledge and Learning Capability: The Magic Potion for Employee Creativity and Sustainable Innovation Performance

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.