REGISTROS DOCUMENTADOS DE LA PRÁCTICA PSICOLÓGICA Y NOCIONES DE SUBJETIVIDAD IMPLÍCITAS EN ARGENTINA (1900-1957). SU ARTICULACIÓN CON LOS CONTEXTOS POLÍTICOS Y ÁREAS PREPROFESIONALES.

Abstract

Historias clinicas, fichas biotipologicas, protocolos, entrevistas, son documentos escritos que registran el modo en que las practicas son efectivamente llevadas a cabo. Constituyen instancias de construccion de consensos discursivos, conceptuales y modos de acceder a la practica que avalan las condiciones de produccion del saber en un momento determinado. La contextualizacion historica de estos documentos permite mostrar la confluencia de las variables sociales, politicas e ideologicas en el analisis de los mismos ya que el material abordado se constituye en la estabilizacion de un proceso de construccion discursiva que da cuenta de la elaboracion de saberes legitimados. El estudio de esta materia invita a reflexionar acerca del modo de comprender la subjetividad, la concepcion diagnostica y clinica, y las practicas que han sido posibles en cada caso. El trabajo presenta una primera aproximacion a la sistematizacion de estos registros de acuerdo a los distintos contextos politicos que enmarcan su aparicion y la emergencia de los sesgos preprofesionales que quedan involucrados. Palabras clave protocolos Historia Psicologia Argentina ABSTRACT DOCUMENTED RECORDS FROM THE PSYCHOLOGICAL PRACTICE AND THE SUBJECTIVITY’S NOTIONS IMPLICIT IN ARGENTINA (1900-1957). ITS ARTICULATION WITH THE POLITICAL CONTEXTS AND PRE-PROFESSIONAL AREAS Clinical records, biotypological data cards, protocols, interviews, are written documents that register the way in which practices are really carried out. They constitute instances of construction of discursive, conceptual consensus and ways to accede to the practice which guarantee the conditions of knowledge production in a determined moment. The historical localization of these documents allows to show the confluence of the social, political and ideological variables in the analysis of them because the material boarded constitutes in the stabilization of a discursive construction’s process which gives an explanation to the elaboration of legitimated knowledge. The study of this matter invites to reflect on the way of understanding the subjectivity, the diagnostic and clinical conception, and the practices that had been possible on each case. This work presents a first approach to the systematization of these records according to the different political contexts, which surrounds its appearance and the emergence of the pre-professional turns involved. Key words Protocols History Psychology Argentina

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.