SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Jurors’ Perceptions of Evidence: The Relative Influence of DNA and Eyewitness Testimony when Presented by Opposing Parties
16 references·1 citing·42 second hop
Jurors’ Perceptions of Evidence: The Relative Influence of DNA and Eyewitness Testimony when Presented by Opposing Parties (2016)Jurors’ Perceptions of Evidence: The Rela…Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. (2014)Do they matter? A meta-analyt…The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear. (2009)The testimony of forensic ide…Does Trial presentation medium matter in jury simulation research? Evaluating the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony (2009)Does Trial presentation mediu…Beliefs about factors affecting the Reliability of eyewitness testimony: A Comparison of judges, jurors and the general public (2009)Beliefs about factors affecti…Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence? (2008)Gold versus platinum: Do juro…The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence. (2007)The effectiveness of opposing…Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications (2005)Contextual information render…Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgments. (2002)Effects of testimonial incons…The effect of jury deliberations on jurors' propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence. (2000)The effect of jury deliberati…Juror reactions to DNA evidence: Errors and expectancies. (1999)Juror reactions to DNA eviden…Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decision making. (1996)Effects of inconsistencies in…Effects of inconsistent eyewitness statements on mock-jurors' evaluations of the eyewitness, perceptions of defendant culpability and verdicts. (1995)Effects of inconsistent eyewi…Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. (1990)Juror sensitivity to eyewitne…Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. (1988)Juror decision making in eyew…Degree of Detail of Eyewitness Testimony and Mock Juror Judgments1 (1988)Degree of Detail of Eyewitnes…College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. (1986)College sophomores in the lab…Perceived realism and the CSI-effect (2017)Perceived realism and the CSI…Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. (1979)Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. (1998)Design of experiments with multiple independent variables: A resource management perspective on complete and reduced factorial designs. (2009)Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis. (2016)Mock-juror belief of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses: A replication and extension. (1989)Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments (2002)Cross-Examination of Sexual Assault Complainants: A Developmental Comparison (2009)The Relation between Consistency and Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimony: Legal versus Cognitive Explanations (2009)Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. (1977)Jury decision‐making biases and methods to counter them (2009)Science, technology, or the expert witness: What influences jurors’ judgments about forensic science testimony? (2016)When self-report trumps science: Effects of confessions, DNA, and prosecutorial theories on perceptions of guilt. (2016)Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)Attribution in social interaction. (1987)Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior (1987)Jurors' perceptions of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases. (1999)The benefits of knowing what you know (and what you don’t): How calibration affects credibility (2008)Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech (1978)The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. (1984)The investigative interviewing of children and other vulnerable witnesses: Psychological research and working/professional practice (2009)The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context (2016)Decision making under time pressure: An independent test of sequential sampling models (1999)The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion (2002)Why Experts Make Errors (2006)Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review (2019)Toward Parsimony in Bias Research: A Proposed Common Framework of Belief-Consistent Information Processing for a Set of Biases (2023)A Theory of Social Comparison Processes (1954)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. (2002)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)A power primer. (1992)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)One angry woman: Anger expression increases influence for men, but decreases influence for women, during group deliberation. (2015)Fall from Grace: The Role of Dominance and Prestige in the Punishment of High-Status Actors (2019)Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. (2002)Reacting to Rape: Exploring Mock Jurors' Assessments of Complainant Credibility (2008)Jury decision making: the state of the science (2013)Deception and self-deception (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature.2,050 cited
  • 2005Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications482 cited
  • 1988Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases.292 cited
  • 1990Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence.267 cited
  • 2014Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments.245 cited
  • 2002Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgments.214 cited
  • 1996Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decision making.130 cited
  • 2008Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence?123 cited
  • 1988Degree of Detail of Eyewitness Testimony and Mock Juror Judgments1106 cited
  • 1995Effects of inconsistent eyewitness statements on mock-jurors' evaluations of the eyewitness, perceptions of defendant culpability and verdicts.103 cited
  • 2009The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.102 cited
  • 1999Juror reactions to DNA evidence: Errors and expectancies.102 cited
  • 2009Beliefs about factors affecting the Reliability of eyewitness testimony: A Comparison of judges, jurors and the general public83 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2007The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence.81 cited
  • 2009Does Trial presentation medium matter in jury simulation research? Evaluating the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony73 cited
  • 2000The effect of jury deliberations on jurors' propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence.65 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017Perceived realism and the CSI-effect11 cited