this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
- 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
- 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
- 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
- 2001Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses2,285 cited
- 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,858 cited
- 2004What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta‐analysis of sparse data1,731 cited
- 1994Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals512 cited
- 2003Registering Clinical Trials511 cited
- 2005Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals472 cited
- 1891What is Efficient Vaccination?348 cited
- 2004The Number, Quality, and Coverage of Randomized Controlled Trials in Nephrology342 cited
- 2014The Need for Randomization in Animal Trials: An Overview of Systematic Reviews294 cited
- 2013Non‐randomized studies as a source of complementary, sequential or replacement evidence for randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work