SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Tips for a great review article: crossing methodological boundaries
11 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Tips for a great review article: crossing methodological boundaries (2016)Tips for a great review article: crossing…Appraising the Quality of Medical Education Research Methods (2015)Appraising the Quality of Med…RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)RAMESES publication standards…Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach (2012)Conducting systematic reviews…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Narrowing the focus and broadening horizons: Complementary roles for systematic and nonsystematic reviews (2008)Narrowing the focus and broad…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Realist review - a new method…Methodologic Issues in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2003)Methodologic Issues in System…Writing Narrative Literature Reviews (1997)Writing Narrative Literature …Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions (1996)Assessing the Quality of Rand…Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Naturalistic inquiryStrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)A Critical Appraisal of Literature Reviews About the Transition to Adulthood for Youth with Disabilities (2006)Factors affecting citation rates in environmental science (2013)Environmental entrepreneurship – Bibliometric and content analysis of the subject literature based on H-Core (2021)Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires (1987)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Interrater Reliability of the Modified Jadad Quality Scale for Systematic Reviews of Alzheimer’s Disease Drug Trials (2001)Examining the Value and Quality of Health Economic Analyses: Implications of Utilizing the QHES (2003)Effects of dance movement therapy and dance on health-related psychological outcomes: A meta-analysis (2013)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation (2015)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Educational Technologies in Problem-Based Learning in Health Sciences Education: A Systematic Review (2014)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Spiritual Care Training Provided to Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review (2015)A systematic review of the published literature on team-based learning in health professions education (2017)A Realist Theory of Science. (1977)62. Realism with a Human Face (2011)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Self-Regulation of Cognitive Inference and Decision Processes (1994)Writing a review article for Psychological Bulletin. (1995)Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. (2020)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2016)The Use of Social Media in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review (2017)The effectiveness of the combined problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) teaching method in the clinical practical teaching of thyroid disease (2020)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research (2012)Thematic Analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1985Naturalistic inquiry45,666 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2005Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions3,187 cited
  • 1997Writing Narrative Literature Reviews1,478 cited
  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses1,374 cited
  • 2015Appraising the Quality of Medical Education Research Methods779 cited
  • 1996Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions436 cited
  • 2012Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach186 cited
  • 2003Methodologic Issues in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses146 cited
  • 2008Narrowing the focus and broadening horizons: Complementary roles for systematic and nonsystematic reviews36 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work