SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Traduction française de dix lignes directrices pour l’écriture et la lecture des articles de recherche
13 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Traduction française de dix lignes directrices pour l’écriture et la lecture des articles de recherche (2014)Traduction française de dix lignes direct…Traduction française des lignes directrices STROBE pour l’écriture et la lecture des études observationnelles (2014)Traduction française des lign…Traduction française des lignes directrices PRISMA pour l’écriture et la lecture des revues systématiques et des méta-analyses (2014)Traduction française des lign…Should research fraud be a crime? (2014)Should research fraud be a cr…Guidelines for reporting health research a user's manual (2014)Guidelines for reporting heal…Elevating the Quality of Disability and Rehabilitation Research: Mandatory Use of the Reporting Guidelines (2014)Elevating the Quality of Disa…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)Effect of using reporting gui…Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Transparent and accurate repo…Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK… and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll? (2009)STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE…Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors (2008)Guidelines for Reporting Heal…The ORION statement: guidelines for transparent reporting of outbreak reports and intervention studies of nosocomial infection (2007)The ORION statement: guidelin…Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)Improving the Quality of Web …The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature (2013)Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementia (2014)Methods and processes for development of a CONSORT extension for reporting pilot randomized controlled trials (2016)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Strengthening the Reporting of Molecular Epidemiology for Infectious Diseases (STROME-ID): an extension of the STROBE statement (2014)Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study (2003)STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)— An Extension of the STROBE Statement (2009)Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery (2010)Strengthening the Reporting of Genetic Risk Prediction Studies: The GRIPS Statement (2011)Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal (2016)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Establishing a new journal for systematic review products (2012)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension (2020)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology (2016)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Procédure pour conduire avec succès une revue de littérature selon la méthode PRISMA (2020)La revue systématique et autres types de revue de la littérature : qu’est-ce que c’est, quand, comment, pourquoi ? (2021)Use of guidelines to improve the quality and transparency of reporting oral health research (2015)Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately (2020)The IDEAL Reporting Guidelines (2020)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians (2008)Knowledge and Perceptions of COVID-19 Among Health Care Workers: Cross-Sectional Study (2020)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)6,450 cited
  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2010Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network589 cited
  • 2007The ORION statement: guidelines for transparent reporting of outbreak reports and intervention studies of nosocomial infection312 cited
  • 2011Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial291 cited
  • 2008Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors219 cited
  • 2014Guidelines for reporting health research a user's manual118 cited
  • 2009STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK… and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll?116 cited
  • 2014Traduction française des lignes directrices PRISMA pour l’écriture et la lecture des revues systématiques et des méta-analyses82 cited
  • 2014Elevating the Quality of Disability and Rehabilitation Research: Mandatory Use of the Reporting Guidelines61 cited
  • 2014Traduction française des lignes directrices STROBE pour l’écriture et la lecture des études observationnelles35 cited
  • 2014

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Should research fraud be a crime?
26 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.