Antecedents and Consequences of Corporatization: An Empirical Analysis of German Public Hospitals

Ivonne Lindlbauer · Vera Winter · Jonas Schreyögg

59 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Policy and Administration Research Health Services Management and Policy Healthcare Systems and Reforms

Abstract

The idea of privatizing or corporatizing public enterprises to improve organizational performance is a central tenet of the new public management movement. Yet while privatization represents a well-established subject of inquiry, corporatization remains a research field scarcely trodden, leaving the public debate bereft of sound empirical evidence. Building on the contingency theory, principal-agent theory, and corporatization literatures, the purpose of this study is to help bridge this research gap by empirically assessing the postulated relationships on the antecedents and consequences of corporatization. Choosing public hospitals as research subjects, it builds on a comprehensive longitudinal dataset and proceeds in four steps: calculating efficiency scores using data envelopment analysis; investigating the antecedents of corporatization with logistic regression; constructing an appropriate control group consisting of noncorporatized public-law hospitals using genetic matching; and comparing changes in efficiency between corporatized and noncorporatized hospitals by means of a difference-in-difference approach. The results indicate that public-law hospitals were significantly more likely to be corporatized under certain circumstances, namely, in areas with a higher degree of spatial competition, during the years around a major change in the reimbursement system (2003–2005), and if they were legally dependent entities. In contrast, having lower baseline efficiency had no significant effect on the likelihood of corporatization. Furthermore, corporatization had a significantly positively effect on the efficiency of previously public-law hospitals. This effect was higher for hospitals that had been legally independent than for those that had been legally dependent. In sum, corporatization is likely an effective alternative to privatization, a finding that leads to a range of implications for practice and research.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 59 citations exist upstream.

References

1978Measuring the efficiency of decision making units 1984Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis 1991A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS?2005Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes 1996The New Public Management in Action 2001Pitfalls and protocols in DEA 1985A Theory of Yardstick Competition 1986Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs

Cited by

2017Integrated Analysis of Healthcare Efficiency: A Systematic Review 2020Public-private partnerships in health care services: Do they outperform public hospitals regarding quality and access? Evidence from Portugal 2020The costs of corporatization: Analysing the effects of forms of governance 2022Corporatization of public services 2018Are Public Sector Managers a “Bureaucratic Burden”? The Case of English Public Hospitals 2017Business Experts on Public Sector Boards: What Do They Contribute?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.