Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

When prior knowledge and law collide: Helping jurors use the law.

15 references·16 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1975Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories5,932 cited
1975Cognitive representations of semantic categories.4,784 cited
2017New York University Law Review2,872 cited
1981Categories and Concepts2,651 cited
1891Black's Law Dictionary1,255 cited
1979Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions376 cited
1986Judging the jury192 cited
1991Prototypes in the courtroom: Lay representations of legal concepts.189 cited
1977Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it?184 cited
1976Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors.182 cited
1986Judging the Jury170 cited
1973Effects of inadmissible Evidence on the Decisions of Simulated Jurors: A Moral Dilemma152 cited
1989Instructing jurors: A field experiment with written and preliminary instructions.136 cited
1979On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts.132 cited
1982Improving the Ability of Jurors to Comprehend and Apply Criminal Jury Instructions121 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

2001Describing jurors' personal conceptions of insanity and their relationship to case judgments.100 cited
2007Child abuse in the eyes of the beholder: Lay perceptions of child sexual and physical abuse89 cited
2002The everyday production of knowledge: individual differences in epistemological understanding and juror‐reasoning skill85 cited
1995Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases.84 cited
1995Inducing jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence: A legal explanation does not help.83 cited
1996What do you expect?: The influence of people's prior knowledge of crime categories on fact-finding.76 cited
1997Commonsense rape judgments: An empathy-complexity theory of rape juror story making.75 cited
2004Venirepersons's Attitudes Toward the Insanity Defense: Developing, Refining, and Validating a Scale.72 cited
1997Effect of blameworthiness and outcome severity on attributions of responsibility and damage awards in comparative negligence cases.72 cited
2006Brain imaging and courtroom evidence: on the admissibility and persuasiveness of fMRI67 cited
2019A meta-analysis of the emotional victim effect for female adult rape complainants: Does complainant distress influence credibility?58 cited
1997A ceiling or consistency effect for the comprehension of jury instructions.52 cited
2000Commonsense justice and jury instructions: Instructive and reciprocating connections.49 cited
2007Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision‐making48 cited
2004Guided jury discretion in capital murder cases: The role of declarative and procedural knowledge.46 cited
2003The influence of opening statement/closing argument organizational strategy on juror verdict and damage awards.45 cited