Citation map · Study

Reporting Quality for Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Cancer Nursing Research

16 references·9 citing·49 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
2005Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.7,009 cited
2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,858 cited
1998The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials769 cited
2008CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts460 cited
2008Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'241 cited
2012Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis235 cited
2005Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors178 cited
2012Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals140 cited
2008The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals133 cited
2004Current findings from research on structured abstracts.120 cited
2010Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by