Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Rebuttal to Jacobson's "New Evidence for Old Arguments"

2 references·16 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1983The Politics of Congressional Elections1,682 cited
1988Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections558 cited

Cited by

1994The Mismeasure of Campaign Spending: Evidence from the 1990 U.S. House Elections159 cited
2007Does Political Advertising Persuade?143 cited
2014How Do Campaigns Matter?139 cited
2011When Candidates Value Good Character: A Spatial Model with Applications to Congressional Elections131 cited
2012Candidates Matter: Policy and Quality Differences in Congressional Elections115 cited
2006Capturing Campaign Effects113 cited
1994The Dynamics of Campaign Fundraising in House Elections99 cited
2004MEASURING THE EFFECTS OF TELEVISED POLITICAL ADVERTISING IN THE UNITED STATES95 cited
2000New Evidence for New Arguments: Money and Advertising in the 1996 Senate Elections92 cited
2008The Campaign Value of Incumbency: A New Solution to the Puzzle of Less Effective Incumbent Spending91 cited
2008Field Experiments Testing the Impact of Radio Advertisements on Electoral Competition89 cited
1998The impact of campaign expenditures on political competition in the French legislative elections of 199384 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2005Campaign spending effects in U.S. Senate elections: Evidence from the National Annenberg Election Survey72 cited

2012Risk Attitudes, Candidate Characteristics, and Vote Choice69 cited

2022When and Why Are Campaigns’ Persuasive Effects Small? Evidence from the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election65 cited

2009District Complexity as an Advantage in Congressional Elections63 cited