SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Stability of Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence Over 8 Years
16 references·14 citing·28 second hop
The Stability of Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence Over 8 Years (2015)The Stability of Extreme Response Style a…Item Response Modeling of Forced-Choice Questionnaires (2011)Item Response Modeling of For…Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation (2001)Response Styles in Marketing …The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. (2000)The rank-order consistency of…Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences (1999)Latent state-trait theory and…Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)Cutoff criteria for fit index…Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. (1998)Fit indices in covariance str…Testing Structural Equation Models. (1994)Testing Structural Equation M…Measuring Extreme Response Style (1992)Measuring Extreme Response St…Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence among Hispanics (1992)Extreme Response Style and Ac…Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach (1990)Structural Model Evaluation a…Comparative fit indexes in structural models. (1990)Comparative fit indexes in st…Effects of Culture and Response Format on Extreme Response Style (1989)Effects of Culture and Respon…Yea-Saying, Nay-Saying, and Going to Extremes: Black-White Differences in Response Styles (1984)Yea-Saying, Nay-Saying, and G…A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis (1973)A Reliability Coefficient for…Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design (1950)Further Evidence on Response …Response Sets and Test Validity (1946)Response Sets and Test Validi…Personality Research and Assessment in the Era of Machine Learning (2020)Personality Research and Asse…Hypothetical Constructs (2020)Hypothetical ConstructsDifferent approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 1): A model integration. (2020)Different approaches to model…Though Forced, Still Valid: Psychometric Equivalence of Forced-Choice and Single-Statement Measures (2019)Though Forced, Still Valid: P…Measuring the dark core of personality. (2019)Measuring the dark core of pe…Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence (2019)Comparison of classical and m…Assessing meaningful within-person variability in Likert-scale rated personality descriptions: An IRT tree approach. (2019)Assessing meaningful within-p…Taking the Test Taker’s Perspective: Response Process and Test Motivation in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Versus Rating Scale Instruments (2018)Taking the Test Taker’s Persp…Joint factorial structure of psychopathology and personality (2018)Joint factorial structure of …Measures of Personality (2017)Measures of PersonalityMeasurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory (2016)Measurement and control of bi…Age trends in HEXACO-PI-R self-reports (2016)Age trends in HEXACO-PI-R sel…Multidimensional Modeling of Traits and Response Styles (2015)Multidimensional Modeling of …“F*** You, I Won’t Do What You Told Me!” – Response Biases as Threats to Psychological Assessment (2015)“F*** You, I Won’t Do What Yo…Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the CETSCALE (1987)A causal model of consumer involvement (1989)Measurement and Control of Response Bias (1991)Cross-Sectional versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines (2008)Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies (2012)Testing and Controlling for Common Method Variance: A Review of Available Methods (2017)The Psychological Bulletin (1904)Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity. (1960)Yeasayers and naysayers: Agreeing response set as a personality variable. (1960)Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items? Study I: Reliability and Validity (1971)An 'American psychologist' (2001)Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit (1992)Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance (2002)Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance (2007)Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. (1980)EQS : structural equations program manual (1989)The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing (1994)The Principles of Psychology (1891)Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (1977)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Personality Development: Stability and Change (2005)Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. (2006)The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development (2006)Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. (1984)rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. (1993)The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. (2016)Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures (2003)Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study (2004)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives108,592 cited
  • 1990Comparative fit indexes in structural models.25,213 cited
  • 1994Testing Structural Equation Models.14,120 cited
  • 1998Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification.12,297 cited
  • 1990Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach7,390 cited
  • 1973A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis7,327 cited
  • 2000The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies.3,239 cited
  • 2001Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation1,261 cited
  • 1946Response Sets and Test Validity898 cited
  • 1950Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design734 cited
  • 1989Effects of Culture and Response Format on Extreme Response Style644 cited
  • 1999Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences508 cited
  • 1984Yea-Saying, Nay-Saying, and Going to Extremes: Black-White Differences in Response Styles371 cited
  • 1992Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence among Hispanics370 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1992
Measuring Extreme Response Style
368 cited
  • 2011Item Response Modeling of Forced-Choice Questionnaires324 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Measuring the dark core of personality.188 cited
    • 2020Personality Research and Assessment in the Era of Machine Learning157 cited
    • 2016Age trends in HEXACO-PI-R self-reports130 cited
    • 2015Multidimensional Modeling of Traits and Response Styles83 cited
    • 2018Joint factorial structure of psychopathology and personality73 cited
    • 2016Measurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory66 cited
    • 2020Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 1): A model integration.58 cited
    • 2019Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence55 cited
    • 2019Though Forced, Still Valid: Psychometric Equivalence of Forced-Choice and Single-Statement Measures52 cited
    • 2015“F*** You, I Won’t Do What You Told Me!” – Response Biases as Threats to Psychological Assessment45 cited
    • 2019Assessing meaningful within-person variability in Likert-scale rated personality descriptions: An IRT tree approach.42 cited
    • 2018Taking the Test Taker’s Perspective: Response Process and Test Motivation in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Versus Rating Scale Instruments37 cited
    • 2017Measures of Personality3 cited
    • 2020Hypothetical Constructs0 cited