Impassible Suffering? Divine Passion and Fifth-Century Christology

John J. O’Keefe

88 citations0/0 files storedTheological Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Augustinian Studies and Theology Byzantine Studies and History Karl Barth and Christian Theology

Abstract

Most textbook accounts of the fith-century christological debated suggest that the humanity of Jesus was the primary concern of the Antiochene theologians. From this perspective, Alexandrian christology, represented by Cyril, appears to have fundamentally misunderstood the meaning of the Incarnation. Dr. O'Keefe argues that the primar theological concern of the debated was the impassibility of God. Thus, the Alexandrians, rather than the Antiochenes, are shown to have defended more faithfully the humanity of the Son of God

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 88 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2003Grace and Christology in the Early Church 2010Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion, and Authorship 2004Social and historical setting: Christianity as culture critique 2004The Apologists 2009Doctrine of God 2004Arnobius and Lactantius 2000"A Letter that Killeth": Toward a Reassessment of Antiochene Exegesis, or Diodore, Theodore, and Theodoret on the Psalms 2004Apocryphal writings and Acts of the martyrs

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.