Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

CONSORT Compliance in Surgical Randomized Trials

16 references·16 citing·33 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2,534 cited
2008Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration2,290 cited
2007Eligibility Criteria of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High-Impact General Medical Journals1,056 cited
2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
1994The scandal of poor medical research897 cited
2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2002Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed833 cited

2009Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation654 cited

2010The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed503 cited

Cited by

2015Do surgery journals insist on reporting by CONSORT and PRISMA? A follow-up survey of ‘instructions to authors’53 cited
2019Research waste in surgical randomized controlled trials45 cited
2014The SPIRIT 2013 statement – Defining standard protocol items for trials40 cited
2020Has the reporting quality of published randomised controlled trial protocols improved since the SPIRIT statement? A methodological study37 cited
2016Quality of reporting in surgical randomized clinical trials37 cited
2018The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in head and neck surgery32 cited
2019Assessment of the reporting quality of RCTs for novel oral anticoagulants in venous thromboembolic disease based on the CONSORT statement30 cited
2016How to Use a Randomized Clinical Trial Addressing a Surgical Procedure24 cited
2018Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions23 cited
2015Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in Cleft Lip and Palate: A 10-Year Review20 cited
2015Mythbusting Medical Writing: Goodbye, Ghosts! Hello, Help!18 cited
2018Comparison of the Quality of Pediatric Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Both Nursing and Medical Journals: Adherence to the CONSORT Statement18 cited
2020Development and Validation of a Natural Language Processing Tool to Generate the CONSORT Reporting Checklist for Randomized Clinical Trials18 cited
2016Reporting trends of randomised controlled trials in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review18 cited
2018The quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional survey18 cited
2014Quality of information reporting in studies of standard and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery16 cited