SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Elevating the Quality of Disability and Rehabilitation Research: Mandatory Use of the Reporting Guidelines
5 references·1 citing·31 second hop
Elevating the Quality of Disability and Rehabilitation Research: Mandatory Use of the Reporting Guidelines (2014)Elevating the Quality of Disability and R…Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)Does use of the CONSORT State…Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)Effect of using reporting gui…Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research (2008)Helping editors, peer reviewe…Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors (2008)Guidelines for Reporting Heal…The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement (2006)The quality of diagnostic acc…Criteria to Evaluate the Quality of Outcome Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials of Rehabilitation Interventions (2020)Criteria to Evaluate the Qual…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature (2013)Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementia (2014)Methods and processes for development of a CONSORT extension for reporting pilot randomized controlled trials (2016)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals (2012)Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions (2019)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)The MAPS Reporting Statement for Studies Mapping onto Generic Preference-Based Outcome Measures: Explanation and Elaboration (2015)Reporting of method comparison studies: a review of advice, an assessment of current practice, and specific suggestions for future reports (2016)PRIRATE 2020 guidelines for reporting randomized trials in Endodontics: a consensus‐based development (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Establishing a new journal for systematic review products (2012)Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Strengthening the Reporting of Molecular Epidemiology for Infectious Diseases (STROME-ID): an extension of the STROBE statement (2014)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach (2015)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa628 cited
  • 2011Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial291 cited
  • 2006The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement235 cited
  • 2008Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors219 cited
  • 2008Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research153 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Criteria to Evaluate the Quality of Outcome Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials of Rehabilitation Interventions10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work