Article1980

The Nature of Managerial Work in the Public Sector

Alan W. Lau · Arthur R. Newman · Laurie A. Broedling

92 citations0/0 files storedPublic Administration Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Policy and Administration Research Public Administration and Governance Public Administration and Political Analysis

Abstract

T he passage of the 1978 Civil Service Reform Act constitutes the first major overhaul of the federal civil service since the system was created in 1883. Included in the reform act is the establishment of a Senior Executive Service (SES) consisting of approximately 8,000 individuals at the GS-16 through Executive IV levels. Under the reform act, the compensation of these executives will be based on individual and organizational performance, not on length of service. Pay for top level executives will be set at one of six levels, with the possibility of lump-sum bonuses being awarded to some of the executives. The reform act abolishes the previous government-wide executive performance appraisal system and charters individual agencies to develop appraisal systems that specify performance requirements and link personnel actions (such as merit pay increses) more closely to individual performance. Performance standards are to be based on objective, job-related criteria and systematic identification of managerial competencies associated with carrying out the tasks and functions of executive positions. Other provisions of the reform act charge the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the agency which replaces the Civil Service Commission, with the responsibility of ensuring that federal agencies establish programs for the training and development of current and prospective SES candidates. Since the reform act has mandated new systems for executive selection, development, and performance appraisal, the importance of describing the public sector job and identifying what executives actually do in accomplishing the requirements of their jobs has become a critical issue. Although there is a large body of literature on what constitutes management and how to select and develop effective managers and executives, little can be applied to the

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 92 citations exist upstream.

References

1974The Nature of Managerial Work 1975The Manager's Job: Folklore and Fact.

Cited by

2001The nature of executive leadership: A conceptual and empirical analysis of success.1983MANAGERIAL WORK: THE INFLUENCE OF HIERARCHICAL LEVEL AND FUNCTIONAL SPECIALTY.1987Are the Classical Management Functions Useful in Describing Managerial Work?2002Organizational Commitment across Three Sectors: Public, Non-profit, and For-profit 1997A Managerial Perspective: Oral Communi cation Competency Is Most Important for Business Students in the Workplace Jeanne D. Maes 1994What is Management? An Outline of a Metatheory 1989STUDIES OF MANAGERIAL JOBS AND BEHAVIOUR: THE WAYS FORWARD 2003Evidence of the construct validity of developmental ratings of managerial performance.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.